No, not you personally, but I thought you were suggesting that this is how "pre-trib viewpoint" understands it. It isn't (however, I accept that SOME pre-tribbers DO view it that way, as in your example at the link you provided, plus likely also the writer of the paragraph you also provided at the bottom of your post)
I agree on one point... that "the supper of the great God" (v.17) is NOT "the wedding feast of the Lamb".
I disagree with his take on "the wedding feast" being up in Heaven (I also disagree on his other viewpoint, elsewhere, that believers can lose of forfeit salvation [however he expresses it, I'm not sure exactly], but that's another subject

)... but I dislike how he only uses one or maybe two passages to supposedly show where we are deriving our viewpoint that the wedding feast/supper will take place on the earth, when actually there are quite a few more than just those two!!
I've gone over these points extensively in other past posts, so I don't want to muddy up this post with all that detail (if I can help it

)... but a few points to just touch on, to reiterate:
--"so shall we ever be WITH [G4862 - UNIONed-with] the Lord"... takes place at the time of "our Rapture," as I see it (IOW, the "marriage" doesn't wait till the end of the 7-yrs [while we wait UP THERE] for it to occur just before His "RETURN" to the earth Rev19);
--Rev19:
7 (pertaining to the "MARRIAGE" and the "Bride / Wife [SINGULAR]")
is DISTINCT FROM Rev19:
9 (pertaining to the INVITED "guests [PLURAL]"--whom the passage only states
of them, "HAVING BEEN INVITED [
perfect participle]"... the "INVITING" took place all throughout the 7 Trib yrs on the earth [not "by US"--as we won't be located on the earth!]... and the ones having been "INVITED" [i.e. TO the MK age] are said to be
"BLESSED"--
which corresponds with about 8 other "BLESSED" passages speaking of those "saints" having come to faith
FOLLOWING "our Rapture" [
all thru the Trib yrs--per the "INVITATION" going out then] and who are "still-living" to ENTER the
earthly MK age [aka "the wedding
FEAST/SUPPER"] upon His "RETURN"
to the earth Rev19);
--Rev19 says, "the marriage
CAME" and the "bride
PREPARED"--I don't believe either of these are saying
the marriage only just now occurred and she only just now finished preparing... for example, the same "CAME" word is found in both 6:17 and 11:18 and I do not believe those are speaking
of the same point in time in the chronology, nor are they saying "is just now arriving" (rather, "came"--especially since, as I've heard Grk grammarians say in the case of 11:18 that the verbs in the sentence should follow [/correspond with] the leading verb in the sentence which in v.17 was saying "
YOU HAVE TAKEN [perfect indicative (i.e. timing-related)] Your great power" and reigned...);
And again, I believe the
already-wed Bridegroom WITH His
already-wed Bride/Wife [SINGULAR] will now (Rev19; Col3:4) be HEADING BACK DOWN
to the earth FOR "the wedding
FEAST / SUPPER" (kick-off / inauguration of the
earthly MK age), where all the passages related to THAT are next in the chronology / sequence... and where NONE of those folks talked about in those passages (even the "saints / righteous / blessed"--having come to faith in Christ FOLLOWING "our Rapture") are (EVER) "lifting off the earth" (i.e. raptured). NO!
Ex. Lk12:36-37,38,40,42-44 (parallel Matt24:42-51) "when he will
RETURN FROM the wedding" (i.e. as an ALREADY-WED "Bridegroom"!)...
THEN "the meal [G347]" (located on the earth, to where He's RETURNING, at that point--and where THOSE folks in that passage [and many others] ARE LOCATED also)
The way I see it, the BEMA has already been concluded when we see that the "24 elders" are wearing "
stephanous / crowns" (Paul had said "awarded IN
THAT DAY" and not to him only, 2Tim4:8--
not the day he would DIE)... and that a searching judgment has already been concluded, as indicated by the word "WAS FOUND" in Rev5:4.
And now I've yacked FAR TOO LONG.