Warning to Christians: Totally Refuse COVID Vaccines
- Thread starter Nehemiah6
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
There is no condemnation for those of us who are in Christ as we are those who walk by the Spirit?
Does the vaccine have potential side effect?. Yes
Is covid overhyped? Maybe yes
Does the vaccine damn you to hell? Of course not!
The mark won't come until the tribulation occurs we are not in it yet. Jacobs Trouble has to come first
Does the vaccine have potential side effect?. Yes
Is covid overhyped? Maybe yes
Does the vaccine damn you to hell? Of course not!
The mark won't come until the tribulation occurs we are not in it yet. Jacobs Trouble has to come first
-
1
- Show all
That's not what the VAERS data says: https://mega.nz/file/1BclVIJa#m2xN7GYOX31EMNC6VgnY4VGncANOMOJIgRkPYUE31lk
What about this link? https://circleofmamas.com/health-news/frontline-workers-testimonials-vaers-reports/
-
1
- Show all
I provided two links that host a pdf that consolidates data from VAERS and various news articles that had reported on adverse effects. You are welcome to look at the VAERS data directly and to hunt down the various articles that cover adverse effects. The VAERS data is published on a US government website: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
-
1
- Show all
And that data may only be showing the tip of the iceberg. The European data (which began to be posted later) showed much higher numbers, meaning that VAERS is under-reporting. Quite the opposite of the fear-mongering over-reporting of so-called COVID cases and deaths. In fact there is an attorney who is now suing both CDC and NIH for deliberately misleading the public and causing panic (which led to disastrous consequences).
-
3
- Show all
uh huh.
here are results from all the anecdotal, completely unverified comments that anyone can enter into VAERS, searching ALL covid vaccines. note that the VAERS website has disclaimers all over it saying none of this means any of the reported adverse affects actually have anything to do with the vaccination and the reported data may be completely false because no one checks it and literally anyone can troll it.
so 4 reports of blood clotting problems out of 150 million administered = 0.000002%
thanks. the problem is actually a hundred times less prevalent, according to your data.
we should expect a whopping 9 people in the whole country to have a blood clot from a vaccination if literally everyone in the country is vaccinated.
scary
here are results from all the anecdotal, completely unverified comments that anyone can enter into VAERS, searching ALL covid vaccines. note that the VAERS website has disclaimers all over it saying none of this means any of the reported adverse affects actually have anything to do with the vaccination and the reported data may be completely false because no one checks it and literally anyone can troll it.
so 4 reports of blood clotting problems out of 150 million administered = 0.000002%
thanks. the problem is actually a hundred times less prevalent, according to your data.
we should expect a whopping 9 people in the whole country to have a blood clot from a vaccination if literally everyone in the country is vaccinated.
scary
-
2
-
1
- Show all
Um, I was talking about blood clots associated with the J&J vaccine, and their tremendously low incidence rate. You asked me how I got those numbers. I showed you the math. Then you put links to a set of unverified data with disclaimers all over it saying it's probably neither trustworthy nor complete.
That data set shows even lower incidence of blood clots associated with covid vaccines.
And now you are changing the subject?
Go back and check the thread mate you seem to have lost the narrative. I'm not coming back to this again. Thanks for the data.
That data set shows even lower incidence of blood clots associated with covid vaccines.
And now you are changing the subject?
Go back and check the thread mate you seem to have lost the narrative. I'm not coming back to this again. Thanks for the data.
-
1
-
1
- Show all
K
Yep. Me too. My mother was upset because she just got the J and J vaccine and then read that it used fetal tissue in some way. She was so upset. And I told her if it was true she didn't know and it's not her fault. I'm not anti-vax, but I want to wait and see how this turns out before I make a decision. Still, my choice what I choose to do medically with my body. No one should be forced to do this.
If you make a choice then make a choice knowing that modern vaccines owe their research and development to tests performed on the stem cells of murdered babies. No exaggeration.
While not all modern vaccines contain actual stem cells, all vaccines are derived from stem cell testing. In some way or another they owe their development to stem cell research. To me that's a problem and I won't be enabling them or dignifying vaccines until when/if they find a more moral/ethical approach to it.
I'm also not going to risk my neck on getting a blood clot or any of that nonsense for a vaccine that doesn't actually prevent the spread of viruses. Even if the risk is very small, they think we're disposable enough to risk our life for an unethical vaccine. That won't be my legacy.
While not all modern vaccines contain actual stem cells, all vaccines are derived from stem cell testing. In some way or another they owe their development to stem cell research. To me that's a problem and I won't be enabling them or dignifying vaccines until when/if they find a more moral/ethical approach to it.
I'm also not going to risk my neck on getting a blood clot or any of that nonsense for a vaccine that doesn't actually prevent the spread of viruses. Even if the risk is very small, they think we're disposable enough to risk our life for an unethical vaccine. That won't be my legacy.
-
3
-
3
- Show all
- Status