whether an article provides information that is favorable or unfavorable toward a worldly political figure is a stupid way to determine whether that source has a biased agenda.
After four years of
hate-filled propaganda from the mainstream media (which continues to this day) your remark is hypocritical at best, and self-serving at worst.
There are at least two-dozen conservative news sources that do not twist everything to fit a pre-planned agenda. They provide actual news and at the same time expose the hatred and violence of the Leftists.
The American media are worse than Pravda in its heyday. At least Pravda did not pretend that it was anything other than the propaganda mouthpiece of the Soviet Union. But CNN, NBC, ABC, CBC, BBC, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the National Review, the Boston Globe, and many others pretend that they are reporting news, when in fact they are spreading propaganda and BS. Even AP and Reuters are no better than propagandists Time, Newsweek, etc.