Your reply is obnoxious in that it has nothing to do with what I posted. You need to learn how to debate.
Emotional feelings toward me do not make an argument. My posts about taking medication that cures the stomach ulcer caused by bacteria, rather than wine is still a solid point and you presented nothing that would suggest that it is not.
Paul suggested a little wine for a stomach issue which tells us that it is not unbiblical or unspiritual or a lack of faith to rely on a medicine to help us with an infirmity. The principle still applies if you take a medicine to cure an ulcer today as it did then when he suggested a little wine.
Your mother taking wine to digest salad has nothing to do with my statements. No one has suggested that you can't use a little wine for it's medicinal benefits. What I said was you would not tell someone to use it for an ulcer caused by a bacteria that there is a medicine designed specifically to cure that. And if you did suggest the medicine for it you would be doing the same thing that Paul did when he told Timothy to use a little wine. Which was the medicine of that time he was suggesting.
Your reply is just an emotional vent toward me personally. You are too full of angst toward me to agree with anything I post even if you agree with it.

If you are getting the impression that I know everything it is only because my posts have been hard for you to discredit. Children in the play ground get angry at their friends that know the answers that they don't know and they call them "know it alls" as an immature response. We are not children.
If you are going to take on the task of discrediting my posts and proving them to be error you should present facts that will accomplish that task. Your mother's use of wine to digest salad did nothing to discredit any of my statements. As a matter of fact there is nothing you can say to discredit my statements because they are true.