Sorry, I'm about to step into this subject and I don't expect my POV to be popular. An alcoholic doesn't know they are one until they take their first drink. I honestly don't understand Christians arguing for drinking. I've never had a drink, will not allow it in my home. That is how I was brought up. The argument for it seems to be that as long as you don't get drunk, there's nothing wrong with it. But even when you're "buzzed" there are things you say and do that you wouldn't if you were sober. I think it's a bad testimony. Alcohol has ruined more families, caused more divorces than you can shake a stick at. There are people who have come out of the world and alcohol is their weakness. What testimony is it for us to sit with a drink and be a stumbling block to them?
My young cousin told me that her brother visited and stayed with her once and he and his wife had no issue with drinking. So they had drinks at each meal and my cousin also drank. After they left there was still alcohol in the fridge. My cousin and her husband continued to partake. Then she said she noticed a pattern. Every time something stressful happened in the day, they would both drink to calm down and take the edge off. One day she mentioned it to her husband and she said " What are we teaching our boys? That we turn to alcohol for our issues instead of God?" He agreed and they took all the alcohol in the house and poured it down the sink. I don't see where alcohol has improved anyone's life, a marriage, a stress. The whole idea of it is to either get buzzed or drunk, and personally I think both are wrong. No one has ever given me a good reason for drinking alcohol. I've never seen a good argument for it. I agree with you brother, I see no benefit in it, but all kinds of issues. The line is very thin, very easy to be buzzed. Some people may know that line and never cross it, but the vast majority don't. JMO