When are we saved ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
So your saying he shoudl not act like @EleventhHour and the other person here?

that was not addressed to you

unless he hired you as his lawyer, it would be helpful to refrain from trying to post in his place

aec28f0b31f6f5bbf6c6b4321eed2186.jpg
 
I think all of this comes down to whether we see saving faith as a gift in the Reformed view.

If Faith must be gifted then God again is picking and choosing, I cannot see anyway around that. .. unless we can say that faith is gifted to all... but how can such faith not lead to salvation if it is indeed faith.

Faith is IN Jesus for salvation ... it is connected to Him... not just a disconnected concept one adopts.

Can a gift be rejected?

So easy to answer!
 
Your theory never gets off the ground because no one was regenerated before the resurrection. 1 pet 1.3 .This is a glaring oversight in reformed theology . Desperately forced into the text because of the T .U L
If I am not mistaken, regeneration comes with the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, Isaiah 63:11 Then he remembered the days of old, Moses, and his people, saying, Where is he that brought them up out of the sea with the shepherd of the flock? where is he that put his Holy Spirit within him?
 
ummm

I disagree. he is saying 2 different things at the same time

I don't find pointing this out accusatory. I am actually slightly bemused and a bit amused

take that as weakness on my part, but I do see both sides of what he is saying

I would be personally grateful if you would not refer to certain other posters here as false accusers and attacking

just sayin' as they say

I am really not taking sides, but this is what I see.
I am calling them out. Just like I called a few calvinists out a few months ago.

If I do not call them out for doing the very thing the calvinists were doing, I am a hypocrite and just as guilty.

This was of seeing everything through calvinist glasses that these two have been putting on is unchristlike. And gives Christianity and this chatroom a bad name.

I think as a member of this chatroom, everyone should call out this kind of nonsense.

I means I guess I could just look oncefallen emails to keep reporting them. But what good would that do?

Paul did not think it wrong to call out peter when peter sinned, we should not be worried either
 
Election is a descriptor of those who have believed and those who have beleived are called to service.

Chosen in Him before foundation of earth.

Foreknown, predestined, called, justified, glorified

Called refers to call to salvation

You left out predestination in your oversimplified post.
 
The verse doesn’t say He gave us the right to become sons of God? Wow.
7The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
9That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10¶He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
12But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14¶And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
 
ummm

I disagree. he is saying 2 different things at the same time

I don't find pointing this out accusatory. I am actually slightly bemused and a bit amused

take that as weakness on my part, but I do see both sides of what he is saying

I would be personally grateful if you would not refer to certain other posters here as false accusers and attacking

just sayin' as they say

I am really not taking sides, but this is what I see.

It seems to you like I am saying two different things, because you aren’t listening.
 
7The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
9That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10¶He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
12But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14¶And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Yep. He gave us power to become sons of God. How do we become sons of God?
 
Can a gift be rejected?

So easy to answer!

I am done here too... but making saving faith a gift creates many problems.. “if God divinely imparts faith, then human responsibility is nullified”

It seems to me that in the Ordo Salutis ... saving faith is connected to the rest and does not fail and is not rejected.

Faith comes through hearing the Word of God, through the convicting and drawing work of the Holy Spirit, and through responding to the revelation that one has already received from God.
 
see EG?

this is what I am referring to

confusing to say the least but with definite C leanings

what can I say

If I looked at just the Words. I could easily just ASSUME this person was a calvinist. Because they use these terms

However, those terms are in scripture. Thus they are not calvinist terms, the are Gods terms.

Our job is to determine which version this person believes

Does he believe in calvins view (double predestination. Regeneration before faith/justification, Chosen not based on free will but through no free will decision whatsoever

or does he believe the biblical view (predestined based on forknowledge to be conformed to the image of God. Regeneration after justification which is given based on faith in the work of God. Chosen based on free will. Gods grace is irresistible but at same time, Men have resisted in unbelief since adam. SO not totally IResistive, it is a free will decision.

After many posts after a few threads, and after many question. The person being accused of calvinism, REJECTS the calvinist view and accepts the free will biblical view.

This is my point. People see him use calvins terms, and automatically accuse him of calvinism. I have not only seen with this man but a few others.

That has to stop. On both sides.
 
I am done here too... but making saving faith a gift creates many problems.. “if God divinely imparts faith, then human responsibility is nullified”

It seems to me that in the Ordo Salutis ... saving faith is connected to the rest and does not fail and is not rejected.

Faith comes through hearing the Word of God, through the convicting and drawing work of the Holy Spirit, and through responding to the revelation that one has already received from God.

How does one become a child of God?
 
see post above

no don't accuse me. I see what I see and that's about it. nothing here I am trying to make true to anyone
I have

And I hav not heard this person say one things in the weeks I have witnessed the discussion here that would make me honk he is calvinist

I do however see him continually falsly accused of such, Because they look fr key words (election, predestined, etc etc) and ASSUME thats what he believes

Which is WHY when I see him say something that appears to support calvinism, Instead of accusing him, I ask him a question.

Every time I have done this, His answer is notcalvinist. Nothing near it.