Are you asking yourself, silly girl?So,you believed in Him without Him drawing you,is that correct?
Are you asking yourself, silly girl?So,you believed in Him without Him drawing you,is that correct?
A careful analysis of the context of John 12:32 yields the strong probably that the "all" here would be meant as both Jews and Greeks. In other words, beyond the bounds of Israel. Nevertheless, this inclusive group still needs to be drawn and called.Jesus said, in John 12:32 (shortly before He would go to the Cross), "And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all to Myself."
And... He said, in John 14:6, "Jesus says to him, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father, if not by [/by means of] Me."
And what are these considerations?A careful analysis of the context of John 12:32 yields the strong probably that the "all" here would be meant as both Jews and Greeks. In other words, beyond the bounds of Israel. Nevertheless, this inclusive group still needs to be drawn and called.
Well, I have to wonder how people can miss the 800lb gorilla in the room.The Calvinist will often say, Jesus only died for those whom God chose [as "His"] before time [before creation].
However, Romans 8:9b says this:
"Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his."
[the underlined is true of us before we come to faith in Christ; therefore the bold is true of us before and up to that point]
QFT. = )![]()
Sorry. Im enjoying my walk here in the botanical gradens. We are at the stunning Chinese exhibit. Maybe later.And what are these considerations?
Beside that, why is the plain language good enough in Romans 8, but here you must appeal to context?
Thatās cool. Enjoy the beautiful fragrances as much as the visuals.Sorry. Im enjoying my walk here in the botanical gradens. We are at the stunning Chinese exhibit. Maybe later.
And have a choosy choicy day!
A careful analysis of the context of John 12:32 yields the strong probably that the "all" here would be meant as both Jews and Greeks. In other words, beyond the bounds of Israel. Nevertheless, this inclusive group still needs to be drawn and called.
Well, I have to wonder how people can miss the 800lb gorilla in the room.
Avoidance is not reconciliation.
https://biblehub.net/searchnt.php?q=elect
https://biblehub.net/searchnt.php?q=election
The silence on God's part certainly gives ambiguity to Elihu's status and there is some accord between them, but Elihu states a number of things that are incorrect. He doesn't just say that Job's speaking is in ignorance, but that Job keeps company with the wicked and states that Job's situation is repayment for his deeds.
Nice, enjoy.Sorry. Im enjoying my walk here in the botanical gradens. We are at the stunning Chinese exhibit. Maybe later.
And have a choosy choicy day!
cv5: But the Bible is clear that we were chosen ONLY because of mercy and pity (as was the nation Israel).
But Elihu's greatest issue is not what he says, but that only God has the proper right to speak at that time.
Yes yes, we know of these Calvinistic ideas.Calvinism defines the elect as that select group whom, alone, God has from eternity past appointed to salvation and this not the correct understanding of the word.
All others are predestined by God to eternal damnation.
The gospel can be preached day and night to the latter and there would be no point, because they are totally incapable of believing it.
Godā¦gives the faith to believe to the selected alone, though He could do so for all.
Yet never is this absurd doctrine evidenced in Scripture.
All are agreed Job speaks in ignorance, but it seems a stretch to state God's reprimand of Job's 3 friends is "keeping company of the wicked" in the way Elihu says it.God also tells Job that he is speaking in ignorance, and Job agrees ((42:3))
God also says the company Job has been keeping has been wicked ((42:7))
God also says that He repays each man for his deeds ((Matthew 16:27))
Oh, I sifted it out of various commentaries. No stroke of genius on my part. You have a few hours to confim my assessment.Nice, enjoy.
Though when you have time, I would appreciate the argument for reading "all" as groups rather than universal, especially considering that the direct context of that statement was following the declaration that judgment was coming and the ruler of the world would be cast out.
Elihu distorts Job's earnest complaints and desire for answers into evil speech against God.
Romans 1:19 (NASB) because that which is known about God is evident with them; for God made it evident to them.
Jesus made it evident to all men.
He has revealed the nature of God to them.
He promised to draw ALL men to Him because of what has been made evident to them.
Yet some suppress this truth in unrighteousness and resist the drawing.
What does āallā mean?....someone who is chosen and drawn suppresses nothing.....He knew his children before they were born.
As is typical, you're quoting a single verse devoid of the context as a pretext.
The key to John 6:65 is found in John 6:64 "there are some of you who do not believe. "
The entire chapter Jesus is dealing with people who think they are the people of God yet are not sensitive to God's teaching, which Jesus affirms in John 6:45 is directed at all.
So in both instances Jesus' statements are a denounement of their view of themselves as children of God based on their heritage and a linking of being God's with being amenable to God's teaching, to believing.
"All" does not mean chosen