E
EleventhHour
Guest
There is zero pride in election. How can there be? There was zero input from the believer.
It is elitism.
There is zero pride in election. How can there be? There was zero input from the believer.
There is zero pride in election. How can there be? There was zero input from the believer.
what conundrum?Thank you for your input but I don't really see how that resolves the previously stated conundrum.
What gets me about that is they can't see the arrogance in that statement, since we're not questioning God's ways we're questioning an interpretation by men. So they are elevating themselves to the position of God in order to avoid having their system questioned. Pure, unadulterated pride.
Appropriate for you maybe but not appropriate for me.Dealt with this already and "whoever" is appropriate according to the Greek grammar.
Elected for what ?There is zero pride in election. How can there be? There was zero input from the believer.
I have heard it said that God is in a sense the Savior of all men. Should he withhold the rain from the wicked they would perish, but the Bible says that He does not. Nevertheless ETERNAL salvation belongs to the believers.
Yet only a remnant are saved. Quite a conundrum eh?
There is zero pride in election. How can there be? There was zero input from the believer.
Thank you for your subtle eloquence, mellifluous verbosity, refreshing insights, and erudite sagacity.Avoidance noted .
Not in a sense....He is the Saviour of all men. He came to save all men. His salvation is only applied to those who believe. That verse is straight forward.
That verse taken by itself would imply that every single person will be saved to eternal life. This is not what the Bible teaches of course.Not in a sense....He is the Saviour of all men. He came to save all men. His salvation is only applied to those who believe. That verse is straight forward.
Truth!!
And why would anyone even want to deny this?
Considering the standard for saving faith is "confess with their mouth and believe in their heart" it seems to me it would take you proving that the belief is unique in kind from common beliefs that men can will themselves to.That verse taken by itself would imply that every single person will be saved to eternal life. This is not what the Bible teaches of course.
Thus far I have seen zero evidence from my detractors that men can, in and of themselves and by their own power, believe with saving committed faith that Jesus is indeed their Lord, Savior and Messiah.
And let me be perfectly clear, so let me qualify the above statement: This saving faith, this believing, must PRECEDE any subsequent act of God, and has PRIORITY over any act of God.
In other words man's free will reigns supreme and Gods will follows thereafter.
So far no contributor here has in the least degree convinced me that the above statements are valid, true and accurately Biblical.
That verse taken by itself would imply that every single person will be saved to eternal life. This is not what the Bible teaches of course.
Thus far I have seen zero evidence from my detractors that men can, in and of themselves and by their own power, believe with saving committed faith that Jesus is indeed their Lord, Savior and Messiah.
And let me be perfectly clear, so let me qualify the above statement: This saving faith, this believing, must PRECEDE any subsequent act of God, and has PRIORITY over any act of God.
In other words man's free will reigns supreme and Gods will follows thereafter.
So far no contributor here has in the least degree convinced me that the above statements are valid, true and accurately Biblical.
That verse taken by itself would imply that every single person will be saved to eternal life. This is not what the Bible teaches of course.
Thus far I have seen zero evidence from my detractors that men can, in and of themselves and by their own power, believe with saving committed faith that Jesus is indeed their Lord, Savior and Messiah.
And let me be perfectly clear, so let me qualify the above statement: This saving faith, this believing, must PRECEDE any subsequent act of God, and has PRIORITY over any act of God.
In other words man's free will reigns supreme and Gods will follows thereafter.
So far no contributor here has in the least degree convinced me that the above statements are valid, true and accurately Biblical.
Hey you are starting to sound like a Calvinist! Because it is true that salvation IS INDEED only applied to those who believe. You are halfway there congratulations!Not in a sense....He is the Saviour of all men. He came to save all men. His salvation is only applied to those who believe. That verse is straight forward.