who make us complicated?What you mean by natural lol? Live off the land, naked, no power kind of natural?
who make us complicated?What you mean by natural lol? Live off the land, naked, no power kind of natural?
who make us complicated?
The true life is simple, natural, and genuine, same is true with our family, community and social economy. People creates "systems" and other concepts which always cause to severely dangerous problems. It is just as simple and natural as when Adam and Eve were in the Eden, if not eating the fruits from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, imagine how wonderful life would be.No comprendo.
As in complicated I see intelligent design. More complicated than most of us can comprehend. God is the who.
Did I answer correctly?
Capitalism, as I understand, and as EleventhHour alluded to, doesn't identify oppression and sin. Essentially, (it means in theory, but not usually in practice), if someone owns all the land, or all the air, or all the water, or something else essential to life, he can charge for that whatever he desires. It can in extremes be a justification for fascism.But that isnt the definition of capitalism. Oppression comes from sin. Any economical system deals with sin within fallen humanity.
Capitalism, as I understand, and as EleventhHour alluded to, doesn't identify oppression and sin. Essentially, (it means in theory, but not usually in practice), if someone owns all the land, or all the air, or all the water, or something else essential to life, he can charge for that whatever he desires. It can in extremes be a justification for fascism.
In the bible, God made sure that everyone had the right to land, as everyone needs land to prosper. Fortunately, the Israelites weren't so foolish as to believe someone could legitimately own the air, or the water, or the sunlight, so there were no laws for these things. This is a lesson that modern man would do well to learn.
However, to distinguish from such foolish thinking as the above, and to distinguish from the "croney capitalism" communist sympathisers have made our current economic system into (i.e. using the government to oppress the free market, while at the same time, using capitalism to justify the ownership by corporations of public property such as land, air, water, sunlight, etc.), I believe a "free market" system is a better descriptor than a "capitalist" system.
Capitalism, as I understand, and as EleventhHour alluded to, doesn't identify oppression and sin. Essentially, (it means in theory, but not usually in practice),
I believe a "free market" system is a better descriptor than a "capitalist" system
As I understand, in a free market, the emphasis is keeping the government out of the economy, (which is a good thing). The more things governments touch, the more things are ruined. The only role of a government is justice - not "social justice", but real justice.I believe they must go together.
Exactly. Remember I'm just talking about the system and not how mankind can abuse it.As I understand, in a free market, the emphasis is keeping the government out of the economy, (which is a good thing). The more things governments touch, the more things are ruined. The only role of a government is justice - not "social justice", but real justice.
In the theory of capitalism, the focus is not so much on keeping the government out, but on the guys with the capital being able to do what they want with that capital. This by itself isn't a problem, but when the law of the land allows these "capitalists" to own disproportionate amounts of public property as "capital" (air, water, land, sunlight etc.) it becomes a problem, because such public property is public, and not for the sole profit of corporations or individuals.
As I understand, in a free market, the emphasis is keeping the government out of the economy, (which is a good thing). The more things governments touch, the more things are ruined. The only role of a government is justice - not "social justice", but real justice.
In the theory of capitalism, the focus is not so much on keeping the government out, but on the guys with the capital being able to do what they want with that capital. This by itself isn't a problem, but when the law of the land allows these "capitalists" to own disproportionate amounts of public property as "capital" (air, water, land, sunlight etc.) it becomes a problem, because such public property is public, and not for the sole profit of corporations or individuals.
No you don't. That's problem, reaction, solution thinking. The problem wasn't the government in the economy, that was the solution. The problem was allowing the Federal Reserve the power to create money (or the government borrowing money into existence, rather than creating it interest free). The power to create money should have remained solely the power of government. You get rid of the Fed, then you don't create great depressions from usurious practices, and then the government can stay away from manipulating the economy to resolve the problem the introduction of usury created.when you remove government from the economy you end up with the great depression, before that the government let them do what they wanted. government came in and made regulation and the US had some of the most progressive years ever. all these regulations began to roll back in the early 70s, and now people dont own their homes, both parents have to work to make ends meet and families are in bigger credit debt than ever.
No you don't. That's problem, reaction, solution thinking. The problem wasn't the government in the economy, that was the solution. The problem was allowing the Federal Reserve the power to create money (or the government borrowing money into existence, rather than creating it interest free). The power to create money should have remained solely the power of government. You get rid of the Fed, then you don't create great depressions from usurious practices, and then the government can stay away from manipulating the economy to resolve the problem the introduction of usury created.
Sure, you'll still get economic high's and low's - that's part of life. But if you've done away with usury, you'll do away with the motive for credit, and people won't be tempted or forced to spend more than they can afford. Those that do - well, some folks will always need to learn things the hard way.
Jesus and the 12 was not a government. Capitalism at the purest form? Sounds subjective to opinion. Labor laws involves morality but not the system itself. US is still majority a freeish market ran by capital. But yet labor laws changed.Jesus and the 12 practiced communism. the community of John the baptist did the same.
not sure why anyone would think the Lord supports free market capitalism. you want to see capitalism in its purest form go to Nigeria, Philippines, or the US circa 1900. i remember reading about the US back then, 16 hr work days 6 days a week, your kids had to go to work as well. lost a limb at work you were fired on the spot and your family starved.
Scripture supports owning property
The problem seems to be that some people interpret "free market" to mean no restrictions or regulations.
Also, those in power pay big bucks to stay in power regardless of the abuses they inflict and cover up.
Scripture supports owning property so communism is ruled out right there, since the state owns everything.
I believe private ownership, using this as means to sustain ourselves, to help poverty one must have excess to give. Scripture talks about a farmer should leave the corners of their fields for the hungry. Also 10% to the church which is best fit to help the poor, the sick, or the lost. Then everything else went to profit.
a fiat system
Better than slavery lol