How do you know it wasn't a copy of the original? You even said it, scribes copied things all the time.
Scribes only copied the Tanakh (Old Testament).
How do you know it wasn't a copy of the original? You even said it, scribes copied things all the time.
My good fellow, Irenaeus, was born in 130 AD in Smyrna a full 60 years after the fall of Jerusalem. He was from Lyon which is located in modern day France. He recalled his discussion on this subject with Polycarp, whom he once met, 35 years earlier. You ever have a hard time recalling perfectly a discussion with someone from 35 years ago? I can't remember what I had for breakfast most days. Either he heard wrong or didn't remember accurately. You are believing triple hearsay from someone who wasn't even there as if it were rock solid evidence. The Bible teaches on the account of 2 or 3 eyewitnesses, you don't have any. Such evidence would be inadmissible in any courtroom in America. I'm glad you aren't a judge. But here you go, blindly following traditions of men because it fits your eschatological view. You have to believe this or your whole belief system is shattered.
The Syrian version of the Apocalypse clearly states that John was banished by Nero. Syria is much closer to the events than France. All I am saying is the date of Revelation is unsettled and unproven whether it be Domitianic or Neroic. Eusebius even claimed that it was unsettled in his day.
I used to believe exactly as you do but was bothered by so many inconsistencies inherent in the futurist view. I took the matter to the Lord in earnest prayer and asked to be shown the truth. I then re-read the NT with an open mind, actually with an eye towards the preterist viewpoint. It was like someone turned a switch on and I started to see clearly. I used to be on here arguing with preterists too before I had my awakening. My whole life I was a futurists until about 5 years ago and I'm much older than you.
Another Doctrine!Irenaeus is not discussing the 70 AD event, he is discussing the 95 AD event!
You deny a future coming of Jesus Christ
You deny a future resurrection of the believer while receiving a glorified body.
You deny a future New Heaven and Earth.
Your views are (Full Preterist), this is considered (Heretical) within the orthodox Christian church, and I agree 100%
What 95 AD event?Irenaeus is not discussing the 70 AD event, he is discussing the 95 AD event!
Another Doctrine!
1.) The individual denies a future return of Jesus Christ to earth?
2.) The individual denies the future glorified body of the believer and resurrection on the last day?
3.) The individual denies a future New Heaven and Earth?
Three Strikes You're Out!
"Avoid Them"!
Romans 16:17KJV
17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
Who copied the Gospels and the rest of the NT including Revelation, and how many copies were made, or, were all the Churches throughout the Roman Empire sharing the original?Scribes only copied the Tanakh (Old Testament).
Who copied the Gospels and the rest of the NT including Revelation, and how many copies were made, or, were all the Churches throughout the Roman Empire sharing the original?
You know it's the side with the poorer argument that resorts to name calling and insults first right? Psychology 101. Was just kind of surprised reading through this then all of a sudden BAM!!!, this just stood out as very weak to me. I thought you were making a good case, and making it well until this. Not how you should speak to a brother or represent our King who says the world will know us by our love for each other. This is my opinion admittedly, just thought it might actually help. Honestly though chill with that, it really does take from the real case you had made to this point.When I read your views, I understand just how Real the Stupid actually is!
Wow went into full blow insult mode, then run and hide mode? Why are we so fragile that we can't hear opinions that are not our own without falling to pieces to the point we "JUST CAN'T DISCUSS THIS!!!!!!!!!!" and run away from it. Biker your meltdown at the end here is honestly embarrassing man. This is how you behave to your fellow human being, never mind a brother? This is what our King calls us to do?I would give you the History of it but why waste my time?
You think 70 AD was the grand slam event!
I have given answers that have been thoroughly proven and when you toss in a Newton quote that took place 1600 years later, I understand what I am dealing with!
Aren't you just a peacemaker. A ray of sunshine you are. "They don't believe like us, quick separate!!!!!" I wish I could say I was shocked. What do you not think we are called to come together to discuss these things and maybe, just maybe, learn something from each other? I know this is a bold thing to say, and I hope it's doesn't "just" offend you, but you are fanning the flames of the anti-Christ spirit here man, dividing so quickly over what really? Do you not trust the Spirit to lead you to all truth? Do you not trust Him to lead us to that very same truth? Maybe it's our interactions He uses to show us what we aren't seeing, and helps us to see the truth, or even a WAY out there possibility, and He uses others to open your eyes to a truth you were blind to. Think it may work a little something like that? Or are you still just "Hurry hide and divide, never ever listen to or share with any of "them". I know which one I feel sounds more like our King.Another Doctrine!
1.) The individual denies a future return of Jesus Christ to earth?
2.) The individual denies the future glorified body of the believer and resurrection on the last day?
3.) The individual denies a future New Heaven and Earth?
Three Strikes You're Out!
"Avoid Them"!
Romans 16:17KJV
17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
I would give you the History of it but why waste my time?
You think 70 AD was the grand slam event!
I have given answers that have been thoroughly proven and when you toss in a Newton quote that took place 1600 years later, I understand what I am dealing with!
I disagree with Jimbone on a lot of things too. But he is always civil about it and doesn't seem to get overly excited when someone disagrees.Thanks Jimbone, even though you don't agree with much of my views. Thanks for defending my right to express them.
I disagree with Jimbone on a lot of things too. But he is always civil about it and doesn't seem to get overly excited when someone disagrees.
?? I'm not sure why you think I don't, but I was actually surprised how much I do share your views, and I KNOW how popular this view is that's why I like it when someone is brave enough to proclaim it, for reasons witnessed here. There may be other things outside of what was said here we might not agree on, I can't remember, but our views on these things line up here. I believe the end of the age Jesus warns of coming before that generation "passes away", did in fact come just as He said it would, and was the promised judgement on the covenant breakers, which is why the temple was taken off earth as well as the genealogies for the priesthood, everything they needed to truly live as God commanded them live, in that AGE. I also believe Jesus is alive and seated at the right hand, right now with all authority in heaven and on earth granted to Him and is reigning until all enemies have been made a footstool for His feet, we are to therefore go and make disciples of all nations, for His glory.Thanks Jimbone, even though you don't agree with much of my views. Thanks for defending my right to express them.