This is a bit jumbled...it's a difficult topic, but if any area speaks to you and encourages withholding judgement and not coming against those that have faith in a way that you may need something that they have been blessed to not have need of. Awesome
This is something I wrestle with myself. Keeping a neutral perspective (with openness) is where I sit in regard to the plethora of information on this topic.
Have you not heard many anecdotal stories of such occurring? I've only heard one from someone that I would trust enough for it to give me pause. Almost all of these are done privately...
I won't share his story, but he can if he cares to someday and maybe I will direct him to this site. I've heard plenty that feel like truth to me, and plenty that I am quite suspicious of.
For myself personally, it's kind of like a barometer. Is this preacher legit? Is this testimony legit? Did that really happen?
Many times it fits into two categories in my own heart.
I don't bring up false signs and wonders as evidence against the Lord moving this way. The enemy is not idle and neither is the Lord.
Another factor is of course cameras, and people "wanting" to "prove" God/miracles. My experience has been, when people start recording, things turn down. It's almost a symptom of unbelief. Analyze that a bit if you would. How would a camera change things? Not just for you, but try to anticipate others motivations.
Note Jesus' experience in Nazareth during his ministry.
There is obviously a lot more technology that delves into the esoteric, which is probably calculated from forces of darkness with a blip here and a blip there. I don't chase stuff like that.
let's say I witness a miraculous healing and even if I am convinced to the bottom of my heart...still. Trust and faith go hand in hand. Am I going to bring a camera crew in (like when the record people in tears praising the Lord) and make certain to document as fully as possible and have a doctor say it doesn't make any sense but that yes something occurred...Ah, but then we cannot prove how it occurred and the response to a lot of these healings in the medical field is..."There's still a lot we don't know about the body, diseases, etc. etc."
Look at a good few miracles in scripture. A fair number of them were actually "eyes only". Very rarely were they done in front of a large group of people. The feeding of the 5,000 was a bit different because it may have been easily missed by many what actually occurred.
Even the healing of the man in John 9:1-3...they had to bring it to a committee to even confirm that it even happened and they still didn't believe. The disciples, the man himself and the parents knew for certain and that may have been all.
Notice the water into wine and "how" it occurred?
Contrast that with the temptation of turning stones to bread.
You could have the signs and miracles that followed the apostles and you would still have to have faith...it is NOT sight. You still have to have faith that he is who he says he is. You still have to have faith in his promises. You still have to have faith that all this agony is for a reason. That reason is Jesus, but what that means each person has to figure out for themselves.
I'm not sure what you believe but start in Revelation 10 and keep reading for a chapter or so. See how that purpose appears to be different from our witness?
There is a lot to discuss regarding this, but I have no doubt that God can choose super private moments that still leave room for doubts because...without faith it is impossible to please him.