Is YOUR church doctrinal statement ONE with SATAN?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
tourist

tourist

Senior Member
#121
Mar 13, 2014
42,665
17,120
113
69
Tennessee
#121
jaybo said:
There are many translations of the Biblical texts, some with different emphases than others. None of them are perfect. In fact, such a thing is not possible because the words that are in the source languages have no English counterpart, the verb tenses are different, and the idioms are very different. Translators do the best they can, with different emphases according to their translation goals.

The Authorized Version was created for one purpose only: to please King James. It has been revised a number of times because the 1611 version had flaws. Deal with it!
Click to expand...
Its main flaw today is the archaic language that makes it tedious to read and follow.
 
crossnote

crossnote

Senior Member
#122
Nov 24, 2012
30,770
3,679
113
#122
John146 said:
Ok, which version contains the pure words of God in the English language?
Click to expand...
LOL, that's what I was trying to find out. Seems like some here are saying the KJV 1611. Is that your view?
 
crossnote

crossnote

Senior Member
#123
Nov 24, 2012
30,770
3,679
113
#123
fredoheaven said:
Again, other translations in every sort may contain the words of God, yet the KJV is the pure words of God.
Click to expand...
That's the language of 'liberal theologians' which I am certain you are NOT.
Can you show me proof that the NKJV, NASB, ESV are any less the word of God than the KJV?
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#124
Jan 13, 2016
17,177
3,700
113
#124
tourist said:
I would surmise that God's word in the English language would be in an English translation of the bible.
Click to expand...
Even if that bible contradicts itself and contains errors? Doe God contradict Himself? Does His word contain errors?
 
B

biker

Banned
#125
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
#125
tourist said:
God has certainly preserved His words in all the languages that the bible has been translated into. Actually, not at all sure what exactly the issue is. I do know that the Word of God is not returned void.
Click to expand...



We all should agree, that the Verbal Words of God are never wrong and never incorrect.
We all should agree, that when these men of God were inspired by the Holy Spirit to write down what we view as Biblical, it was 100% correct.
We all should agree, from what was inspired and written BUT then later translated several times is not absolutely 100% the Word of God!
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#126
Jan 13, 2016
17,177
3,700
113
#126
jaybo said:
In fact, such a thing is not possible because the words that are in the source languages have no English counterpart, the verb tenses are different, and the idioms are very different.
Click to expand...
Cannot God have His word perfectly translated into English, and those English words be perfect for English speakers? Couldn’t God do this in any language He desired?
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#128
Jun 30, 2015
25,619
13,863
113
#128
John146 said:
Even if that bible contradicts itself and contains errors? Doe God contradict Himself? Does His word contain errors?
Click to expand...
More rhetorical questions based on human reasoning instead of God's actual words. C'mon John, step up. You know the Bible so well, but you can't come up with even one verse that says what you believe?
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#130
Jun 30, 2015
25,619
13,863
113
#130
... the ones that clearly declare uncertainty about the wording in some passages?
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#131
Jun 30, 2015
25,619
13,863
113
#131
John146 said:
Cannot God have His word perfectly translated into English, and those English words be perfect for English speakers? Couldn’t God do this in any language He desired?
Click to expand...
Apparently you did not read my post where I stated that what God can do is irrelevant. What He has done (or declares that He will do) matters.
 
tourist

tourist

Senior Member
#132
Mar 13, 2014
42,665
17,120
113
69
Tennessee
#132
John146 said:
Even if that bible contradicts itself and contains errors? Doe God contradict Himself? Does His word contain errors?
Click to expand...
The question that you asked was where God's word can be found in English and I surmised that it probably could be found in a bible written in English. Regarding the 1611 English KJV, it would be only an opinion that this version is without flaws of any kind so therefore it is superior to other versions or translations in English or any other language. Personally, I prefer the NKJV with modern English that is easier to read and digest than the KJV version, 1611 or otherwise. Even saying that a bible contains contradictions or errors is an opinion. When taken in context with the entire Word of God the contradiction may not be a contradiction at all but rather a misunderstanding on the part of the reader. The same thing could be said for perceived flaws as well.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#133
Jan 13, 2016
17,177
3,700
113
#133
Dino246 said:
More rhetorical questions based on human reasoning instead of God's actual words. C'mon John, step up. You know the Bible so well, but you can't come up with even one verse that says what you believe?
Click to expand...
Do you really need verses that state God cannot lie? His words are faithful and true? Every word of God is pure? God is not the author of confusion?
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#134
Jan 13, 2016
17,177
3,700
113
#134
Dino246 said:
Apparently you did not read my post where I stated that what God can do is irrelevant. What He has done (or declares that He will do) matters.
Click to expand...
He declared to preserve His words. Where are they? Do we have access to them?
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#136
Jan 13, 2016
17,177
3,700
113
#136
tourist said:
The question that you asked was where God's word can be found in English and I surmised that it probably could be found in a bible written in English. Regarding the 1611 English KJV, it would be only an opinion that this version is without flaws of any kind so therefore it is superior to other versions or translations in English or any other language. Personally, I prefer the NKJV with modern English that is easier to read and digest than the KJV version, 1611 or otherwise. Even saying that a bible contains contradictions or errors is an opinion. When taken in context with the entire Word of God the contradiction may not be a contradiction at all but rather a misunderstanding on the part of the reader. The same thing could be said for perceived flaws as well.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your honesty.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#137
Jun 30, 2015
25,619
13,863
113
#137
John146 said:
He declared to preserve His words. Where are they? Do we have access to them?
Click to expand...
You won't accept the answer, so I won't bother giving it to you.
 
B

biker

Banned
#138
Apr 5, 2020
2,273
464
83
#138
When the definition of BEGOTTEN is a child from 2 parents or a purpose put into place, we can see how the KJV makes us think wrongfully concerning God and the WORD. Begotten either means someone existed BEFORE the other, or it means a purpose was put into place for a reason. By all technicality, the term BEGOTTEN removes co-eternal and co-equal. And that leads to "now what does that mean for the Trinity?" KJV dropped the ball.

Because in 1 John 5:18
We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not; but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not.
^
We were never physically born of God, but we are definitely BEGOTTEN of God for His Purpose!
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#139
Jun 30, 2015
25,619
13,863
113
#139
John146 said:
Do you really need verses that state God cannot lie? His words are faithful and true? Every word of God is pure? God is not the author of confusion?
Click to expand...
Provide Scripture, not questions.
 
J

John146

Senior Member
#140
Jan 13, 2016
17,177
3,700
113
#140
Dino246 said:
You don't use the 1611 version, or at least you don't quote from it. Do you even have a copy? Do you read the sidenotes?
Click to expand...
From a friend and fellow brother in Christ...

First of all, the King James Bible has NEVER been “revised”. By this we simply mean that the King James Bible’s underlying Hebrew and Greek texts have never changed in over 400 years. When the bible agnostics speak of the alleged “thousands of changes” in the various editions or printings of the King James Bible, what has really changed is the type font from Gothic print to the Roman type, the spelling of many words like sinne to sin, and doore to door, Goe to go and hee to he. The spelling has been modernized, but the text itself has never changed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.