No. Life without the ONE who has sealed us is miserable...Life without the assurance of saving faith is miserable.
No. Life without the ONE who has sealed us is miserable...Life without the assurance of saving faith is miserable.
On the contrary my good works speak to the fact that I am indeed saved by grace through faith.Do your evil works speak for your lack of saving faith?
So you don't do evil works?Assurance that you are saved comes from how you live.
For example:
"13Those who have served well gain an excellent standing and great assurance in their faith in Christ Jesus." - 1 Timothy 3:13
Where is HE? That is the GOOD NEWS for sure, but you are ONLY PROVIDING HALF of the GOOD NEWS...Christ's atonement which saves is the gospel. Trying to prove one has saving faith by his good works is a denial of the gospel.
So you don't do evil works? What do those evil works represent?On the contrary my good works speak to the fact that I am indeed saved by grace through faith.
(Titus 2:14)
He gave Himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds.
Sudakar now on iggy. This is not going anywhere and becoming abusive.Your trust in good works to prove your saving faith and your trust in evil works to disprove your saving faith proves you don't know whether you'll have saving faith till your last breath. You can have no joy and assurance you are saved.
Don't beg the question.
Yep...whoever you quoted is correct...You said: Only the Lord knows who are tru saved by the seal of the Holy Spirit.
Self righteous people cannot bear truth.Sudakar now on iggy. This is not going anywhere and becoming abusive.
It was in my experience as well, it wasn't all automatic of course, and by no means did everything come on so quickly, but I'm curious to the argument you're making here (and not "argument" like a fight, just the conversation) because after reading it, it's anything but clear. What is you're experience with being born again? Was there no automatic change in your life? I'm honestly trying to find out what part of God's power coming into us to forever open our eyes to truth, and completely changing us automatically, is something you'd argue against? Did I miss where you where going with this comment?
One part of what you said is correct.Your trust in good works to prove your saving faith and your trust in evil works to disprove your saving faith proves you don't know whether you'll have saving faith till your last breath.
Let's test your opinion about not having joy against scripture:You can have no joy and assurance you are saved.
What I don't do is live in evil works.So you don't do evil works?
AmenSome of the apparent flaws of the troll @Sudakar
1. He holds disdain for "evidence of conversion" all the while announcing his alleged sinless perfection as "evidence of his own conversion" while ridiculing others.
2. He proclaims he is perfect according to Matthew 5:48, yet obviously isn't. Why? He provided slanderous accusations against John MacArthur that are proven baseless and untrue. But that doesn't matter to him. If he were "perfect" he would not have made such a mistake, nor committed this sin.
3. His behavior is trollish, posting the same response many times in a row to several people, and, he also avoids where he has been refuted, corrected &c.
4. He blindly keeps posting the same things, paying little to no attention to what others have said.
5. He digs up my older posts after I stated he can get his last word in, so, when others aren't responding, he does this in order to attempt to get some more arguing going.
6. He has other threads where he engages in the same behaviors.
Side note, Matthew 5:48 is fulfilled by Christ for those in Christ. It is then exemplified in the believer by living a sanctified lie, sanctification, Hebrews 12:14 ; Romans 6:22 (a very wonderful verse!)
May I offer a little advice?I don´t think I am taking part in this thread anymore...
This man is a hypocrite...and I am not so sure he understands what the righteousness of GOD is...
"Salvation isn't the result of an intellectual exercise. It comes from a life lived in obedience and service to Christ as revealed in the Scripture; it's the fruit of actions, not intentions. There's no room for passive spectators: words without actions are empty and futile...The life we live, not the words we speak, determines our eternal destiny." (Hard to Believe, p. 93 .. 1st Edition)
"Salvation isn’t gained by reciting mere words. Saving faith transforms the heart, and that in turn transforms behavior. Faith’s fruit is seen in actions, not intentions. There’s no room for passive spectators: words without actions are empty and futile. Remember that what John saw in his vision of judgment was a Book of Life, not a book of Words or Book of Intellectual Musings. The life we live, not the words we speak, reveals whether our faith is authentic." (Hard to Believe, p. 93 .. 2nd Edition)
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
The words posited in the OP were a publisher's error in the 2003, 1st Edition of John MacArthur's book, Hard to Believe. The errors were not discovered until the 1st Edition had already hit the bookshelves, but as soon as they were, the corrections that you see above (in bold) were made to the text, and a 2nd, corrected edition was released soon after.
It is important to note that the 1st Edition words (that seem to support the OP's false/incorrect definition of Lordship salvation) are not the words that the book's author (MacArthur) intended or wrote, rather, they were revisions made by an editor w/o his knowledge or consent. To be clear, Dr. MacArthur believes that salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, apart from good works (or anything else that ~we~ do).
Finally, Dr. MacArthur neither teaches nor believes the OP's unique definition of "Lordship Salvation" (that "one's salvation is CONDITIONAL upon the life we live"), because that is NOT the correct definition of Lordship Salvation.
Here's the public statement that MacArthur and his broadcast ministry made concerning the 2003 1st Edition book errors and what they did to correct them.
Does John MacArthur teach salvation by works in his book Hard to Believe?One paragraph in the first edition of Hard to Believe contained a glaring error that has the potential to mislead readers about the book’s whole intent. The problematic passage is the opening paragraph of chapter 6 (page 93), which seems to suggest that salvation is the fruit of godly living. The truth is exactly the opposite.The error was inadvertently introduced into the manuscript in the late stages of the editorial process, when (in order to simplify the book) four chapters were deleted from the original manuscript and one of the remaining chapters was severely abridged. John MacArthur approved the abridgments.Apparently, however, in an effort to make a new transition that would smooth over the deletions, an editor involved in the process made significant revisions to the opening of chapter 6. Unfortunately, that change was not submitted to John for approval. We believe the error was an oversight, and not anyone’s deliberate attempt to tamper with the book’s theology. The result, however, severely muddled the message of the book.A revision was sent to the publisher for future editions of the book. In all subsequent printings, here is how the opening paragraph of chapter six reads (revisions are in bold):"Don’t believe anyone who says it’s easy to become a Christian. Salvation for sinners cost God His own Son; it cost God’s Son His life, and it’ll cost you the same thing. Salvation isn’t gained by reciting mere words. Saving faith transforms the heart, and that in turn transforms behavior. Faith’s fruit is seen in actions, not intentions. There’s no room for passive spectators: words without actions are empty and futile. Remember that what John saw in his vision of judgment was a Book of Life, not a book of Words or Book of Intellectual Musings. The life we live, not the words we speak, reveals whether our faith is authentic."
~Deut
Sadly, it did notBut I suppose this will not change Sudakars mind.
BTW, this thread is titled, "THE LIE IN LORDSHIP SALVATION THEORY", which is a misnomer, because the "lie" isn't ~in~ the Lordship Salvation theory, rather, the lie in this thread was made ~about~ the Lordship Salvation theory in the OP, and the OP author knows it.But I suppose this will not change Sudakars mind.