are you on switch hunt where did I say you said that? Maybe if you are not so confrontational you would not assume one said something they did not. my point the books are inspired not because Man said so, they are inspired because God ensured they would be. man issue is learning which is and is not inspired. I think and I could be wrong, many will not say that; there are ways to limit and look for truths that illuminate the inerrant word of God. One must build on what we know to be true from the start.
- the first five books of the law
- The Major & Minor Prophets
- the genealogies
- New Testament Eye Winesess account The Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John.
- The book of Acts and the Pauline Epistles do not take away from the others.
To say something other than what we know to be the "inspired word of God", how did one come to the conclusion they were inspired?
That is a presumption to say "They are definitely God-inspired". How did one come to the understanding?