Elijah and Moses, IMO. Enoch types the raptured Bride.
Elijah and Moses already came back (Mat 17:3).
Elijah and Moses, IMO. Enoch types the raptured Bride.
Yes there is much sybolism.
There is also what John saw that is not sybolic.
2 witness are literal men (died ,resurrected,ascended)
PlainWord,
Then what about any living Christians who survive the Tribulation? I believe that the rapture occurs before the wrath of God is unleashed; probably after the 6th seal is opened but before the seventh seal is opened.
(I believe that the first five seals have already been opened.)
Any believers who come through the tribulation will be present on earth at Jesus' return; and will remain through the millennial reign.
you would accept half of the description as symbolic and the other half as literal. Isn't that a bit unusual? Much of the prophesy of Ezekiel and Daniel IMO expects literal fulfillment; but contains many symbolic elements; so no, I don't think it is particularly unusual.
In the case of Elijah, he did not consume people by fire from his own mouth, rather fire came down from heaven and consumed them.
The two witnesses are said by John to be able to consume their enemies from fire from their mouths. See?
In the case of the two witnesses, whether the fire literally proceeds from their mouths or is called down by their mouths seems of little importance.
Any believers who come through the tribulation will be present on earth at Jesus' return; and will remain through the millennial reign.
you would accept half of the description as symbolic and the other half as literal. Isn't that a bit unusual? Much of the prophesy of Ezekiel and Daniel IMO expects literal fulfillment; but contains many symbolic elements; so no, I don't think it is particularly unusual.
In the case of Elijah, he did not consume people by fire from his own mouth, rather fire came down from heaven and consumed them.
The two witnesses are said by John to be able to consume their enemies from fire from their mouths. See?
I remember this thread.
I joined cc just for this thread.
I was popeye back then.
( one bad eye. Got it fixed 2 years ago) lol
There is a video at the near the end of the Third Temple News thread, that I will post here as well as it pertains to what will go on here after the Church is removed, to go to the Wedding of the LAMB.
[video=youtube;9Rmk6_bIDMM]
Don't confuse HIS COMING as KING of Kings, with HIS APPEARING to call out His Bride.
One happens so slowly that all the armies of the earth can gather at the Valley of Megiddo to try to stop Him.
The Appearing that must happen first (seven years earlier) happens so fast that it is compared to as lightning flashes from the east to the west.
@VCO have you read dcon's book? opinions?
quote feature doesnt work but this is what vco said:
thats true actually.
when Jesus says "dont turn back and dont go pick up anything from your house" talking about His coming that can be what you said coming as king of kings.
but what st.paul says in the blink of an eye, if it happens that quick you dont have time to even think about a house or turning back.
what do you say about it dcon?
Dcon talks about many of the pretrib arguments in his book you can find here:
https://christianchat.com/blogs/book-on-the-2nd-coming-of-christ.172326/#post-3728744
why is it wrong in your opinion?
quote feature doesnt work but this is what vco said:
thats true actually.
when Jesus says "dont turn back and dont go pick up anything from your house" talking about His coming that can be what you said coming as king of kings.
but what st.paul says in the blink of an eye, if it happens that quick you dont have time to even think about a house or turning back.
what do you say about it dcon?
sad to hear.I am not interested in his opinions and do not want to argue about it, as I stated earlier, it is a Settled Issue or Subject in my HEART, and the Holy Spirit has confirmed I already have the TRUTH.
hows it different events? both are second coming?SIMPLE.....two DIFFERENT events with TWO different APPLICATIONS......CONTEXT.....come on.....wow!
I skimmed through it.Dcon talks about many of the pretrib arguments in his book you can find here:
https://christianchat.com/blogs/book-on-the-2nd-coming-of-christ.172326/#post-3728744
why is it wrong in your opinion?
can you share a few of these verses? would be a first. actually could anyone share any pre-trib rapture verses? i (and most in church history) find the number of 0.Leaves out EVERY VERSE (well as far as i can tell) that depicts and points to a pretrib rapture.
unlike all the pretrib books right? impartial and not looking for pretrib rapture on every corner possible since its not there plainly so its all about deducing and bouncing all over the bible.His book is a study with a preconcieved notion.