Semiramis the goddess.
TRInity means three, Father, Son, Spirit, 1+1+1 = 3 , you know how to count right?
i understand the babalon trinity just fine, they tell you right on the front end, three gods, they dont take the exact same thing and tell me its three but its one but its three in one, but seperate . . . .and in the end the exact same end result.
I would like to see a reference that ancient Babylonians worshiped a triad of gods called Nimrod, Semiramis and Tammuz. This is something that is made up by cultists and weird Christians like Alexander Hislop. Nimrod and Semiramis didn't even exist in the same century, let alone have a child, Tammuz, together.
Buy yourself a copy of Alexander Hislop's book "Two Babylons" and you will see where Seventh Day Adventists, Jehovah's Witnesses, Herbert Armstrong's followers, and some Hebrew Roots Movement guys got their fables.
Read this website..Semiramis was not Nimrod's wife and to claim so is a foolish teaching related to Alexander Hislop.
https://www.ancient.eu/Semiramis/
It is similar to the Jewish myths and fables that the NT says for believers to avoid.
Quote from site:
She (Semiramis) remains, therefore, one of the more controversial figures from ancient history and has become more so since the 19th century CE when the Christian minister
Alexander Hislop published his book
The Two Babylons (1858 CE), linking Semiramis with the whore of Babylon from the biblical Book of Revelation, Chapter 17. Even though
The Two Babylons is clearly anti-Catholic propaganda and has no claim to biblical or historical accuracy, it is still cited by certain protestant Christian works as an authority on the subject, and the book therefore contributes to the controversy surrounding Semiramis. The book claims, to cite only two examples of biblical inaccuracy, that Semiramis was Nimrod’s wife, whereas Chapter 10 of Genesis says no such thing, and famously insists that Semiramis is the whore of Babylon when her name is nowhere mentioned in the
Bible. The historical inaccuracies in the work are too numerous to mention. Even so, the book continues to exert a powerful influence over certain readers and their understanding of ancient history in general and Semiramis specifically. Whether Sammu-Ramat was the model for Semiramis continues to be argued by modern historians, who often cite the same ancient inscriptions for their conflicting arguments, and it does not seem to be a debate that will be settled anytime soon. Based simply on the evidence of Sammu-Ramat being able to erect her own stele at the prestigious city of Ashur, however, it would appear she was a very impressive and very powerful Assyrian queen who was known to later generations as Semiramis.
The author is kind and says "certain readers"...I would use the word "nuts".
Some might say, I didn't learn this from Hislop, but they are getting their information third and fourth hand from guys who read Hislop's materials.
1
