Yay!!! I win!!!Yes, that means that you have earned a permanent place on my IGNORE LIST.
God bless you anyway.
Yay!!! I win!!!Yes, that means that you have earned a permanent place on my IGNORE LIST.
. . .
That is blasphemy,pure and simple.
. . .
Sister. All you have to do is go to the law and look at the priest
The washing and anointing were 2 different events. Once these took place the Levite was a priest
The same happens to each and every one of us who are gods children. You are washed (baptized) then anointed. Once this is done we are saved and sealyou do not pray to get baptized by the spirit it happens the moment you say yes to God. It is part of the process of god saving you
All gifts no matter what they are are given after these events take place
I neither think it against the Holy Spirit, nor something the speaker is making up.
I think it is apart from this, it is a phenomena of the brain, that is the ecstatic utterances.
That’s because they spoke in whoever they were talking tos languageI would like someone to quote a few scriptures of angels talking to men and men not understanding them......every time they spoke in the bible it was understood by all that heard it.........
I am not talking about tongues I am talking about the baptism of the spiritOk, so back to my story with my Baptist friend. He understood the tongues before it was interpreted. How would you explain that? If it was made up how did he, a person who did not believe in tongues, understand what was being said? If it was just gibberish, as folks in this thread are saying, how did he understand what was being said?
That’s because they spoke in whoever they were talking tos language
It was to confirm to Unbelieving Jews that the NEW WORDs that the Apostles were Teaching were as much the WORD OF GOD and those Words in the Old Testament, for the JEWS REQUIRE A SIGN.
1 Corinthians 14:21-22 (NIV)
21 In the Law it is written: "Through men of strange tongues and through the lips of foreigners I will speak to this people, but even then they will not listen to me," says the Lord.
22 Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is for believers, not for unbelievers.
Mark 16:20 (NIV)
20 Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them
and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it.
As far as I am concerned, tongues in the Charismatic Church and Pentecostal Churches, in 1906, fell for a man made COUNTERFEIT, after it CEASED after the NEW TESTAMENT WORDS were validated by the APOSTLES to ENOUGH JEWS.
Matthew 16:4 (ESV)
4 An evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign, but no sign will be given to it except the sign of Jonah.” So he left them and departed.
EVERY COMMENT that you can make, can be answered by my 9 Segment Study.
I have NO INTEREST in Discussing this, or Debating it with anybody anymore.
READ THE STUDY, if you want to KNOW WHAT I ABSOLUTELY BELIEVE and has been confirmed in my heart by the Holy Spirit.
IT IS A SETTLED ISSUE FOR ME and most other Non-Charismatics, like the expression goes: You are whipping a dead horse.
I am not talking about tongues I am talking about the baptism of the spirit
Exactly....not some estatic jibberish passed off as languages
typical attitude of charismatics
I am not YELLING when I put something in all caps. I do it to to emphasize my statement.
I do not care what FACE BOOK calls it, I have NEVER HAD A FACE BOOK ACCOUNT, and NEVER WILL, and I DO NOT PLAY BY THEIR RULES.
How Wude! The typical attitude of charismatics.
It's not gibberish. Again,confirmation bias.
And there we have the truth finally. Judgmental much? Rather a blanket statement.
Sure is..........and no....stating facts......nice try though and I could as easily lay that same BIAS charge to charismatics.....It's not gibberish. Again,confirmation bias.
obviously he does not interpret...sorry...a little joke there![]()
Ok, so back to my story with my Baptist friend. He understood the tongues before it was interpreted. How would you explain that? If it was made up how did he, a person who did not believe in tongues, understand what was being said? If it was just gibberish, as folks in this thread are saying, how did he understand what was being said?
It's not gibberish. Again,confirmation bias.
Sure is..........and no....stating facts......nice try though and I could as easily lay that same BIAS charge to charismatics.....
Were you there?
It could have been a foreign language.
Ich kann gut übersetzen und interpretieren, wenn es eine bekannte Sprache ist, die im Folgenden nicht ---->hdjebd hshdhdh jdhdgshjs kajebdbds ist