E
eternally-gratefull
Guest
I could be wrong, but i would think he would say those people are not “in Christ”, thus would be lost.A simple yes or no, please.
I could be wrong, but i would think he would say those people are not “in Christ”, thus would be lost.A simple yes or no, please.
WIf a person lives their life in such a manner, there is no scriptural reason for that person to assume that he or she is a believer. See 1 John 4 So your question is faulty.
A true believer will fall, may even lapse for a long time in some cases. But like a sheep that by nature will not dwell in mud like a pig (just an analogy), they won't want to stay there,m. It is not in a sheeps nature to dwell in mud.
A true believer will fall, may even lapse for a long time in some cases. But like a sheep that by nature will not dwell in mud like a pig (just an analogy), they won't want to stay there,m. It is not in a sheeps nature to dwell in mud.
The prodigal child left his father, we are not told how long he was gone, it could have been a few years for all we know, if he died before he came back, would he have ceased to be his fathers son?If a person lives their life in such a manner, there is no scriptural reason for that person to assume that he or she is a believer. So your question is faulty.
A true believer will fall, may even lapse for a long time in some cases. But like a sheep that by nature will not dwell in mud like a pig (just an analogy), they won't want to stay there,m. It is not in a sheeps nature to dwell in mud.
Yes I agree 1,000%. I do too, but do you also see how we got to the root of the problem here, it really raised a red flag when Budman spoke of the "works for salvation/as evidence of salvation" like they were interchangeable and the same argument, as if they aren't two COMPLETELY different things. Then the whole "if works are evidence of salvation, are the Mormons saved" argument was very telling because that is a argument solely from the flesh. Almost every argument he is making seemed to be coming from the same "fleshly foundation" as well. And I understand, I too felt the same way before the old man was put to death and by Gods grace I was granted repentance and was born again, my spirit was made alive and reconciled to His Spirit. and like you said "And I need God's grace and power EVERY step of the way.", couldn't agree more and will and that this is also why He gets all credit, these "works" are a direct result of our new nature, they are the "side effect" of being spiritual born again, you are now "that e=which is born of the Spirit, by His grace and now anything I do is His to claim all the glory for, any "work" I do I only do by His power and He rightfully gets all the credit, and I am still in complete awe that He is so overwhelmingly "GOOD!!!", only God is good, and I praise Him in Jesus name.I have to be honest, still sin, but I know that when I sin willfully, it is a choice of the will. I like what R.C Sproul said, "when we sin, it is because our desire for what was tempting is greater than our desire to be obey Christ. Woe!. Such a thought is appalling to me, that I could choose sin over Christ. It is a terrible thing. I want to love Jesus more so I sin less, and I want to sin less because I love Jesus. I need to walk in the Spirit, not in the flesh. Because I want to know Him and the power of His Resurrection. I do not consider myself to have already attained or perfect, but this I do, forgetting the things that are behind, I press forward to the prize of the high calling. And I need God's grace and power EVERY step of the way.
I want to perfect holiness in the fear of the LORD. So help me God...
A saint hungers for holiness. We are already positionally holy, and we strive for practical holiness more and more, for HE is Holy.
This all soinds good, but i want doctrine which does more than sound good,I think people do not want to believe that God would make some vessels for destruction because they feel that would be unfair but really if God is God he created us and knew sin would enter the world and not all would be saved isn't really the end is the same. If God had the power to save but left us to our fallen natures does that make Him less "unfair"? So if He looked down the "tunnel of time" and saw that I would choose Him and Susie would not how is that not saving myself? In the end it would really be your good choice that saved you. And how about those that didn't have the opportunity you had? Parents never raised you in the Lord, raised a Muslim, etc. And if you respond to the light they had then offering people salvation through witnessing would probably actually condemn more people since now they would know and narrow is the path. When I came to understand the Doctrines of Grace it at first angered me but then it actually answered more questions and strung together the scriptures. Armenian doctrine really doesn't make God any fairer if you believe He is Omnipotent. I would of said please don't leave me to myself for I do not know what I do and I am a sinner. IMO
Again brother you are looking at this in the flesh. It's not about how much you sin, or even your golden go to "do you still sin", that you know will always have to be answered yes. But simply by the way you look at it I can tell you don't know Him, you are still spiritually dead. I understand, that is why He says it is IMPOSSIBLE to please God in the flesh "." When you are born again you are born of the Spirit, this is actually an event that CHAGES you, and makes you desire to glorify Him, to tell others the truth He has opened your eyes to. Before this happens you can not see it, you look at things just like you are now. This is by NO means a dig at you, brother this is me showing you the most love I possibly can by telling you that you have it wrong. I only know thing because I had it wrong for a long time too. I realize now that back then I really loved the "idea" of Jesus, but I live here in the real world, I said the prayer, was dunked under water, but I had no idea that these words are true to the core, when I was lost I looked at it much like you are now, I had no one to tell me there is more to it, when you see you life and any other direction beside towards Him is futile. Heck I didn't even call out His name when He granted me repentance and I was made new.If one believer does an average of, let's say, 20 good works a week, and another believer does an average of one good work a week - is the first more saved than the latter?
Now there's a motivating reason to go and teach the lost! But what does it matter, you and your household were predestined to be saved and never to be lost and tough luck on all those who are actually lost. No use in teaching them the gospel.I think what's missing in this equation is that the unsaved, or non-elect, DON'T CARE.
I know people who are perfectly content to wallow in their sin. They have no desire or intent to seek a Savior. They KNOW the Truth, but they have suppressed the Truth because they love their sin so much.
Your words about the lost while you relish in your I Thank God I am Not As The Publican attitude of OSAS is not only disgusting by most measures of decency, it's contrary to the spirit of Christ.I think what's missing in this equation is that the unsaved, or non-elect, DON'T CARE.
I know people who are perfectly content to wallow in their sin. They have no desire or intent to seek a Savior. They KNOW the Truth, but they have suppressed the Truth because they love their sin so much.
What is the mud?If a person lives their life in such a manner, there is no scriptural reason for that person to assume that he or she is a believer. So your question is faulty.
A true believer will fall, may even lapse for a long time in some cases. But like a sheep that by nature will not dwell in mud like a pig (just an analogy), they won't want to stay there,m. It is not in a sheeps nature to dwell in mud.
He choose Israel over the other nations...so you are saying that God provided a way through Jesus Christ? So us choosing Him and accepting this gift is how we are saved? What makes one person accept and another one reject? Good witnessing, opportunity to hear gospel, godly parents, Christian nation, harder life, fear of hell. It doesn't sound any more just to me. Millions perish never being offered the gift or ever hearing of Jesus Christ.This all soinds good, but i want doctrine which does more than sound good,
if god choses some but not others, he has placed some above others,
God claims to be a God of love, he can not claim to be a God of perfect love yet not perfectly love all people
Because of Gods justice, Gods love can not save anyone by itself, gods justice demands a penalty for sin, and gods love can not overrule,
However Gods love can make a way, it can pay the sin debt, satisfying gods justice, but since God is a god of perfect love, he can not force this gift on anyone, As a loving creatore, from that love, he desired his creation to want his gift. That is what pleases him, just like a loving father is pleased when their children willingly recieve our gifts,
if that child recieves the gift, in no way can that child boast or claim she earned that gift, but she can boast in the father who loved her so much he bought her that gift,
if the child rejects the gift. It does not make the father any less loving of that child than the one who recievd it. It is the child who loses out (and quite frankly the one who bough the gift is hurt or grieved.)
He never chose to save all israel, he chose descendents of abraham isaac and jacob for a specific purposeHe choose Israel over the other nations...so you are saying that God provided a way through Jesus Christ? So us choosing Him and accepting this gift is how we are saved? What makes one person accept and another one reject? Good witnessing, opportunity to hear gospel, godly parents, Christian nation, harder life, fear of hell. It doesn't sound any more just to me. Millions perish never being offered the gift or ever hearing of Jesus Christ.
What is the mud?If a person lives their life in such a manner, there is no scriptural reason for that person to assume that he or she is a believer. So your question is faulty.
A true believer will fall, may even lapse for a long time in some cases. But like a sheep that by nature will not dwell in mud like a pig (just an analogy), they won't want to stay there,m. It is not in a sheeps nature to dwell in mud.
The prodigal child left his father, we are not told how long he was gone, it could have been a few years for all we know, if he died before he came back, would he have ceased to be his fathers son?
What is the mud?
Yes I agree 1,000%. I do too, but do you also see how we got to the root of the problem here, it really raised a red flag when Budman spoke of the "works for salvation/as evidence of salvation" like they were interchangeable and the same argument, as if they aren't two COMPLETELY different things. Then the whole "if works are evidence of salvation, are the Mormons saved" argument was very telling because that is a argument solely from the flesh. Almost every argument he is making seemed to be coming from the same "fleshly foundation" as well. And I understand, I too felt the same way before the old man was put to death and by Gods grace I was granted repentance and was born again, my spirit was made alive and reconciled to His Spirit. and like you said "And I need God's grace and power EVERY step of the way.", couldn't agree more and will and that this is also why He gets all credit, these "works" are a direct result of our new nature, they are the "side effect" of being spiritual born again, you are now "that e=which is born of the Spirit, by His grace and now anything I do is His to claim all the glory for, any "work" I do I only do by His power and He rightfully gets all the credit, and I am still in complete awe that He is so overwhelmingly "GOOD!!!", only God is good, and I praise Him in Jesus name.
That is the only way I can see these things, the only way any of us see these things, and when we hear things like "the old man is put to death sometime later", or the only other example I can think of when I actually said "you are not saved if ______", was when a professing Christian said that the Father did not put the wrath due to Him on Jesus, that Jesus wasn't crushed by the Father for his sin, and that the very idea of God punishing Jesus for pour sin would make God a monster. Really. I told him that if Jesus didn't paid his price, then God wrath was still abiding on him. I truly hope I am not giving the impression at all I am claiming I or anyone other than Jesus is or was sinless.
I know we are being sanctified and your post describes it beautifully, but this I also see as Budmans "go to, gotcha" deception, almost like his very foundation, the question "but you still sin right?", to which we always have to say "yes", but this is not even what I'm speaking about, and count how many times he ask it. the thing is I agree we still sin, I never once suggested we didn't it just seems you get offended by the suggestion the Jesus changes peoples whole nature and this changes results in "works" Oh the dreaded word, I mean we can't promote working for Jesus, no sir. I just see this as ridiculous. The problem I see here is the whole message is, "Once saved always saved, repeat this prayer, okay your in and remember first and foremost we will still always sin. There can be no change in you and remember works is the worst thing a Christian can do, just kick back and remember "You still sin". I just think this is a set up for a church full of well meaning false converts, like "I was for a good long while". I remember why this was so appealing, and while I don't believe this is how they thing about it, and I was being a bit tongue cheek, I felt this way for 5 years without knowing Him. I hope it was also made apparent where his misunderstanding are and God was just using this to grow him in truth. More than that I pray God shows him I was only saying these things in love because there was an apparent breakdown in his spiritual understanding of the truth.
To be honest I hate the back and forth on here endlessly over every single detail (of course this holds true anywhere people talk about anything online, not just "here"), and really never even listening to each other and both attacking straw men . I truly find face to face interaction to be on such a higher level that I have honestly been all but ignoring online chat completely, but this conversation has kind of reminded me that God uses all things for His glory, and that maybe He can grow me in this way as well, regardless it's all for His glory. Have a great day brother, and may He draw you and your family closer everyday, in Jesus name. Amen.
You said sheep go in the mud. Who are the sheep and what is the mud?Something a pig likes to wallow in, but a sheep doesn't.
You
You said sheep go in the mud. Who are the sheep and what is the mud?
You
zzzzz
You said sheep go in the mud. Who are the sheep and what is the mud?