You are absolutely right i apologize. That’s what I get for chatting and watching tv at the same time.![]()
No prob. I understand. I'm not particularly focused right now either. (NACHOS!
You are absolutely right i apologize. That’s what I get for chatting and watching tv at the same time.![]()
This is simply untrue, but it would take thousands of words to show you why. Essentially, you do not understand that the Abomination of Desolation, the Great Tribulation, and the Second Coming of Christ are ALL FUTURE EVENTS. Therefore Daniel's 70th week is still in the future.I mention this because many Christians are still looking for a “70th week” that begins when the Antichrist signs a peace treaty with Israel. In my opinion this will never happen because the 70th week was when Christ was crucified.
This is simply untrue, but it would take thousands of words to show you why. Essentially, you do not understand that the Abomination of Desolation, the Great Tribulation, and the Second Coming of Christ are ALL FUTURE EVENTS. Therefore Daniel's 70th week is still in the future.
When you begin with false premises, you end up with false conclusions.
I don't know where you got that information.Your dispensational interpretation has the 69th week ending on Palm Sunday. J
I don't know where you got that information.
The 69th week ended when "Messiah was cut off (crucified). And that would be 30 AD.
Thats an interesting take on it. Thanks. I'll check that out!Romans 15: 8, "Now I say that Jesus Christ has become a servant to the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made to the fathers." There is the confirming of the covenant in Dan 9: 27A. Unfortunately, some attribute this to the antichrist which is a shame.
^ Then we could also consider the following passage to mean "two" [and the "third"] literal 24-hr days, and we could go hunting for how that [24-hr days] was fulfilled:
Hosea 5:15-6:3 -
"15 I will go and return to my place, till they [Israel] acknowledge their [Israel's] offence, and seek my face: in their [Israel's] affliction they [Israel] will seek me early [/earnestly].
1 Come, and let us [Israel] return unto the LORD: for he hath torn, and he will heal us [Israel]; he hath smitten, and he will bind us [Israel] up.
2 After two days will he revive us [Israel]: in the third day he will raise us [Israel] up, and we [Israel] shall live in his sight. [consider similar wording in Ezek37 and other parallels I've listed before]
3 Then shall we [of Israel] know, if we follow on to know the LORD: his going forth is prepared as the morning; and he shall come unto us [Israel] as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth.
Then there's also the wording "unto the messiah the prince" and that Palm Sunday [in fulfillment of Zechariah 9:9 "thy king cometh unto thee" (speaking of "Jerusalem"--recall "and upon thy holy city")] was the first time He allowed the city to "bless" Him as such... and then He spoke the words that He did in Luke 19:42-44 ("the things which belong unto thy peace!" [speaking of "Jerusalem"]... "but now they are hid from thine eyes"...); and considering also Rom9:26/Hos1:10 [re: Israel], and Rom9:25/Hos2:23b [re: the Gentiles], and the "blindness... UNTIL" aspect of Rom11:25-28 [15]… and more...
After two days, in other words on the third day, Christ revived from the dead along with Hosea and the other Old Testament saints and Hosea and the rest lived in the sight of Christ. Then Christ came on to Israel, the ones who went on to know the Lord and Christ came on to them as the latter rain.
Hello TheDivineWatermark,Okay, so Daniel 12:13 says (of Daniel [OT saint]), "But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest [that is, in death], and stand in thy lot [that is, be resurrected to stand again on the earth] AT THE END of the days [that is, at the END of the 'days' referred to in that CONTEXT: vv.6-7,1-4]."
So you are suggesting that that [very specific(-ally-worded-in-Hebrew)] time period of "a time, times, and an half" was the time period of Jesus' [3.5-yr] earthly ministry while still alive/before His death? (known as "a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation [Israel] even to that same time"...?? [v.1]) Doesn't make sense to me, sorry to say.![]()
At the end of Israels days Daniel and all of the old testament that weren't translated (Enoch and Elijah and maybe others that aren't mentioned) rose with Christ.Okay, so Daniel 12:13 says (of Daniel [OT saint]), "But go thou thy way till the end be: for thou shalt rest [that is, in death], and stand in thy lot [that is, be resurrected to stand again on the earth] AT THE END of the days [that is, at the END of the 'days' referred to in that CONTEXT: vv.6-7,1-4]."
The time of Jacobs trouble was when Christ came. Christ cursed them, took the kingdom from them and then sent armies in AD 70 to destroy them.... How do you not figure that's not the time of Jacob's trouble?So you are suggesting that that [very specific(-ally-worded-in-Hebrew)] time period of "a time, times, and an half" was the time period of Jesus' [3.5-yr] earthly ministry while still alive/before His death? (known as "a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation [Israel] even to that same time"...?? [v.1]) Doesn't make sense to me, sorry to say.![]()
Hello TheDivineWatermark,
There are only two other areas with similar description to the time, times, and an half in Daniel 12:7. These appear in Daniel 7:25 as a time, and times, and the dividing of time; and in Revelation 12:14 as a time, and times, and half a time, to which Revelation 12:6 explains represents 1,260 days.
Exactly, the three time like descriptions all pertain to the end of the current age.Yes.
I'm telling KJV1611 "why" I disagree with his take on it.![]()
At the end of Israels days Daniel and all of the old testament that weren't translated (Enoch and Elijah and maybe others that aren't mentioned) rose with Christ.
The time of Jacobs trouble was when Christ came. Christ cursed them, took the kingdom from them and then sent armies in AD 70 to destroy them.... How do you not figure that's not the time of Jacob's trouble?
Let's say you're right and that's not the time of Jacob's trouble and it's really at the end of time, then where do you see TWO destruction's of Israel in the Old Testament?
This is totally incorrect. The time of Jacob's trouble cannot be dissociated from the reign of the Antichrist, and that is yet in the future.The time of Jacobs trouble was when Christ came. Christ cursed them, took the kingdom from them and then sent armies in AD 70 to destroy them.... How do you not figure that's not the time of Jacob's trouble?
Exactly, the three time like descriptions all pertain to the end of the current age.