Speaking in tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Noose

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2016
5,096
932
113
That was another pister saying Corinthians was not prescriptive and I disagreed.

IMO, that is rather weak. If both were 'gathered to his people', that doesn't mean there were two different sets of people. They could still be the same people. And it also points toward this being an idiom.

.
Except, Moses was buried by God and angels.
Guess again.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
So if Paul teaches that Christ is in believers and also believes that it is better to be with Christ than to remain alive in flesh, it is logical to say Paul believed he will be caught together with his listeners (indwell them) - something that he taught Corinthians/Thessalonians and now Philippians.
Caught up does not mean indwell. The way you arrive at your unusual theory is by redefining words, it seems. Paul was looking forward to a real resurrection of the dead, which Daniel described as the saints which slept in the dust arising. He was looking for the dead in Christ and the living saints being caught up to meet Christ in the air.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
What is it you want it to say? What is the spiritual meaning of that parable? What kind of new language or tongues cast out demons?Is it the gospel as the language of God that causes demon to flee as it is written?
The passage does not say the new tongues will cast out demons. We see an example of casting out demons in Jesus' name when Paul said, "In the name of Jesus Christ, I command you to come out of her."

If you are going to use allegorical interpretation, keep in mind that the ancient authors who suggested such an approach also believed in the literal level of interpretation as well. If you take the Bible as only allegory, how would you be saved? Do you believe Jesus Christ rose bodily from the dead, or is the resurrection purely an allegory.

And it only makes sense to accept some of the allegorical interpretations if you treat them as extra-biblical prophecies and judge them as prophecies, because there is no reason to believe them unless you believe the interpreter is receiving some kind of revelation.

Is it not all about believing (having faith) or not believing? (no faith)

(1) Believe not prophecy ...the sign of rebel.

(2) Believe God's word prophecy.... the sign of one who hears God.
If we believe the Bible, then we will believe what it says about the gift of prophecy. The Bible does not say 'believe not prophecy.' It says 'Quench not the Spirit. Despise not prophesyings. Prove all things. Hold fast to that which is good.'
 

Noose

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2016
5,096
932
113
Caught up does not mean indwell. The way you arrive at your unusual theory is by redefining words, it seems. Paul was looking forward to a real resurrection of the dead, which Daniel described as the saints which slept in the dust arising. He was looking for the dead in Christ and the living saints being caught up to meet Christ in the air.
Aaah that's the common doctrine it is almost turning into a meme nowadays, turns out common doesn't necessarily mean true.

1. Paul was looking forward for the day of the Lord which he made clear that it won't delay:

Heb 10:36 You need to persevere, so that after you have done God’s will, you will receive what He has promised. 37For, “In just a little while, He who is coming will come and will not delay.

It is clear Paul was not looking forward to 21st century but 1st century, we also know the Lord cometh with ten thousand of his saints so the living believers were to make room for them.

2. From Paul's own teaching, one can deduce that the dead being caught up with the living actually means the dead rise to indwell the living. And Paul himself at one point counted himself amongst the dead that will rise and be caught up with his listeners in Corinth and at some point counted himself amongst the living who the dead will rise and be caught up with. If Paul was talking about the 21st century resurrection he would only count himself amongst the dead who will rise and be caught up those that will be living in that period.

3. Daniel was talking about a general period of time called the end times which started in the 1st century and still continuing. So Daniel never talked about a specific time.

4. Isaiah prophesied about the dead rising and going in rooms to be protected from the wrath of God on the earth.

Isa 26:
19But your dead will live, Lord;
their bodies will rise—
let those who dwell in the dust
wake up and shout for joy—
your dew is like the dew of the morning;
the earth will give birth to her dead.
20Go, my people, enter your rooms
and shut the doors behind you;
hide yourselves for a little while
until his wrath has passed by.

21See, the Lord is coming out of his dwelling
to punish the people of the earth for their sins.
The earth will disclose the blood shed on it;
the earth will conceal its slain no longer.


Which rooms do you think these are?
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
There is more than one kind of tongues.
I know of at least five different kinds.
The kind you are referring to is only one kind.
Therefore, the prescription only applies to that one.

What were you saying about Corinthians not being prescriptive?
But here you are discussing a prescriptive.
That was another poster saying Corinthians was not prescriptive and I disagreed.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,606
13,863
113
Wrong.

The people being spoken of are not physical but spiritual. This is the account of Aaron's death:

Num 20:
22 The whole Israelite community set out from Kadesh and came to Mount Hor. 23At Mount Hor, near the border of Edom, the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, 24“Aaron will be gathered to his people. He will not enter the land I give the Israelites, because both of you rebelled against my command at the waters of Meribah. 25Get Aaron and his son Eleazar and take them up Mount Hor. 26Remove Aaron’s garments and put them on his son Eleazar, for Aaron will be gathered to his people; he will die there.”

27Moses did as the Lord commanded: They went up Mount Hor in the sight of the whole community.28Moses removed Aaron’s garments and put them on his son Eleazar. And Aaron died there on top of the mountain. Then Moses and Eleazar came down from the mountain, 29and when the whole community learned that Aaron had died, all the Israelites mourned for him thirty days.

So when God told Moses that he will die and be gathered to his people just like Aaron died and was gathered to his people, He actually means two different groups spiritually and not physical because Moses died and was buried by God and the angels and not people.

This is Moses' death:

Deut 34:5 So Moses the servant of the LORD died there in the land of Moab, as the LORD had said.6And He buried him in a valley in the land of Moab facing Beth-peor, and no one to this day knows the location of his grave.

Jude 1:9 But even the archangel Michael, when he disputed with the devil over the body of Moses, did not presume to bring a slanderous judgment against him, but said, “The Lord rebuke you!”

I can't see anything to suggest that Moses was gathered to the same people as Aaron.
You're welcome to your fanciful speculations, but they have nothing to do with biblically-sound doctrine.
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
five different kinds? Five different languages/ tongues as clear sounds that make up words that carry a conversation? I know a person who speaks 7 different languages that convey the gospel in each .
I don't mean five languages. I mean five different kinds of tongues. Here's my list. (limited)

Five Different kinds of tongues
1) Personal prayer language - Speaking to/with God
2) Intercessory prayer language - Praying for others in the Spirit
3) Prophetic prayer language - Addressing the whole church/preferably with interpretation
4) Singing in the Spirit - Singing in tongues/worship activity
5) Evangelistic language - Speaking the message of God to a people in their own language (not yours)

The kind most people think of in I Corinthians is #3 on this list.
The tongues at the outpouring at Pentecost would be #5.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,801
8,620
113
That's a great point.
I do speak in tongues, but don't EXPECT anyone else to.
Even though I believe the ability is for any believer that wants it.
And I highly recommend it. But I neither expect it,
nor judge others who don't yet have use of it.

There are plenty of other evidences of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
Like the Fruit of the Spirit. I do however take issue with those who
don't speak in tongues that either want to tell me what it is,
or when and how it is to be used.
I have never seen or heard legitimate tongues my entire life. And believe me, I am watching.
I have however heard and seen outrageous nonsensical gibberish posing as tongues. Bogus tongues can be seen on YouTube any time you like. Legitimate tongues? Quite the contrary.
Nor one single solitary legitimate miraculous healing of the "capital A" Apostle kind.

Your points 1 thru 4 are common to all Christians. In their native tongue unless they are polyglots.
 

Wansvic

Well-known member
Nov 27, 2018
5,265
1,110
113
No, God did not send me, i'm just arguing from my understanding and from my understanding, i know what can not be true.

Philippians 1 defeats your own position and backs my position. Paul is comparing two things 1) To remain in flesh and continue teaching them and winning those that are lost among them, and 2) to be with Christ

Paul says being with Christ is much better, but where is Christ?

Rom 8:9 You, however, are controlled not by the flesh, but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. 10 But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, yet the Spirit gives you life because of righteousness.

So if Paul teaches that Christ is in believers and also believes that it is better to be with Christ than to remain alive in flesh, it is logical to say Paul believed he will be caught together with his listeners (indwell them) - something that he taught Corinthians/Thessalonians and now Philippians.
Paul is expressing that his true desire would be to die and be face to face with Christ rather than be here dealing with this mortal life. However, he realizes that God can and will use him to help educate unbelievers and believers alike if he stays.

Phil 1:23-24
For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far better:
Nevertheless to abide in the flesh is more needful for you.
KJV
 

PS

Senior Member
Jan 11, 2013
5,399
695
113
I have never seen or heard legitimate tongues my entire life. And believe me, I am watching.
I have however heard and seen outrageous nonsensical gibberish posing as tongues. Bogus tongues can be seen on YouTube any time you like. Legitimate tongues? Quite the contrary.
Nor one single solitary legitimate miraculous healing of the "capital A" Apostle kind.

Your points 1 thru 4 are common to all Christians. In their native tongue unless they are polyglots.
I can vouch for what Sketch is saying. I was the son of a Pentecostal pastor who both spoke in tongues and interpreted. It was all done according to the instructions of the apostle Paul and there were always people in every congregation who had the gift.
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
I have never seen or heard legitimate tongues my entire life. And believe me, I am watching.
I have however heard and seen outrageous nonsensical gibberish posing as tongues. Bogus tongues can be seen on YouTube any time you like. Legitimate tongues? Quite the contrary.
Nor one single solitary legitimate miraculous healing of the "capital A" Apostle kind.

Your points 1 thru 4 are common to all Christians. In their native tongue unless they are polyglots.
You have a right to your opinion.
If you have never heard "legitimate" tongues how would you know the difference?

Oftentimes when I am out in public I will hear what sounds like tongues at my church.
When I look I see some foreigners speaking to one another.

Since you say only only apostles with a capital "A" can administer healing, I am guessing that you are a Cessationist.
You wouldn't believe they were authentic tongues no matter what.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,801
8,620
113
You have a right to your opinion.
If you have never heard "legitimate" tongues how would you know the difference?

Oftentimes when I am out in public I will hear what sounds like tongues at my church.
When I look I see some foreigners speaking to one another.

Since you say only only apostles with a capital "A" can administer healing, I am guessing that you are a Cessationist.
You wouldn't believe they were authentic tongues no matter what.
If you have never heard "legitimate" tongues how would you know the difference?
When somebody....anybody.....posts the video here on CC forums. Simple. And if the phenomenon is so utterly commonplace, so should be the PRIMA FACIE evidence. Competent medical observers would be useful as well.

Bottom line: Early Church tongues were an absolute fact, verified by Church witnesses and authorities and DULY RECORDED and on the record.
Now? Not so much. Waiting for the duly recorded requirement. Still waiting.

Please upload your videos to this thread.

BTW I am no cessationist. Sign gifts will return in due time at the end times.

Thank you for your time.
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
I can vouch for what Sketch is saying. I was the son of a Pentecostal pastor who both spoke in tongues and interpreted. It was all done according to the instructions of the apostle Paul and there were always people in every congregation who had the gift.
Thanks. That's a good word.
I have never addressed the whole congregation in tongues.
But I do my personal prayer language and the same for intercessory prayer. (praying in the Spirit)
I have also seen healing come.

A man walked into a healing service using a cane because his back was in terrible pain.
He could barely walk. I was in the prayer line when they aske us to pray for the person ahead of us.
I felt a tremendous heat come on my hands. I didn't tell the man I was praying for that this was happening.

I asked if he felt anything while I prayed for him. He reported a tremendous heat on his back where I was laying my hands.
His pain had gone from a 10 to an 8, so we pressed in until it went to 5 and then 3 and then 0.
Afterwards he was walking around the sanctuary waving the cane over his head praising God.
The next Sunday he testified before the church that he had been healed and that I had prayed for him.
This has not happened to me since. I thought God was showing me that I had a healing ministry. Not so.
 

PS

Senior Member
Jan 11, 2013
5,399
695
113
Thanks. That's a good word.
I have never addressed the whole congregation in tongues.
But I do my personal prayer language and the same for intercessory prayer. (praying in the Spirit)
I have also seen healing come.

A man walked into a healing service using a cane because his back was in terrible pain.
He could barely walk. I was in the prayer line when they aske us to pray for the person ahead of us.
I felt a tremendous heat come on my hands. I didn't tell the man I was praying for that this was happening.

I asked if he felt anything while I prayed for him. He reported a tremendous heat on his back where I was laying my hands.
His pain had gone from a 10 to an 8, so we pressed in until it went to 5 and then 3 and then 0.
Afterwards he was walking around the sanctuary waving the cane over his head praising God.
The next Sunday he testified before the church that he had been healed and that I had prayed for him.
This has not happened to me since. I thought God was showing me that I had a healing ministry. Not so.
Everyone I have ever known who has been involved in healing has felt heat in the affected area.

Keep your mind stayed on Jesus (2 Tim 8) and God will bless you in your witness. :)

And people question the gifts of the Holy Spirit. :(
 
Aug 12, 2013
306
75
28
Speaking in tongues is a gift to speak in another language you didn't learn on your own, but it is God giving you the gift to speak to others so you may testify, spread the Gospel and so on to others if you don't know their language.

The tongues that go - "waka batta riki tiki ozu kiss me!" while someone throws their hands up in middle of a chapel service or even do it alone in a room are not real gifts of God of speaking in tongues. The bible clearly states someone should not be speaking in tongues if people don't understand and there is no translator. Speaking in the tongues Pentecostals refer to is a lie and misunderstood.

I prayed about it, for the fact most my family are Pentecostals, they do this, and they claim if you are saved you will do this. I studied a long time to be sure about this and asking the Lord for understanding. Even at a service, the pastor who does this fake stuff tried to teach my friend how to do it, but his voice just goes "uuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhh" and they tell him he will start to speak in tongues eventually if he is saved and has the holy spirit. But he always went "uhhhh." So would I if I believed that junk.

They tell me they don't even know what they are saying to God, but they can feel something while they do it. Its as if God is glorifying himself by speaking through you. If you ask me, that looks completely useless and not like any of the other things God does. It serves no need or purpose. Would he rather us not know what we are saying to him? Do we need to speak in another language to glorify him? No.

I know if I was willing to do the will of god and seek him with all my heart that he would reveal the truth about his words, and he did. But of course even some Pentecostals debate on certain details how and what speaking in tongues is. Some say all Christians will have this gift, it's a sign you are saved and filled with the spirit, some say it's only a gift for some chosen people and such.

I know it's all false. It has a purpose to translate. It serves a godly purpose. That gibberish doesn't.

I've read enough scripture, seen enough experiences and spoke with the Lord about it long enough to know.
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
Speaking in tongues is a gift to speak in another language you didn't learn on your own, but it is God giving you the gift to speak to others so you may testify, spread the Gospel and so on to others if you don't know their language.

The tongues that go - "waka batta riki tiki ozu kiss me!" while someone throws their hands up in middle of a chapel service or even do it alone in a room are not real gifts of God of speaking in tongues. The bible clearly states someone should not be speaking in tongues if people don't understand and there is no translator. Speaking in the tongues Pentecostals refer to is a lie and misunderstood.

I prayed about it, for the fact most my family are Pentecostals, they do this, and they claim if you are saved you will do this. I studied a long time to be sure about this and asking the Lord for understanding. Even at a service, the pastor who does this fake stuff tried to teach my friend how to do it, but his voice just goes "uuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhh" and they tell him he will start to speak in tongues eventually if he is saved and has the holy spirit. But he always went "uhhhh." So would I if I believed that junk.

They tell me they don't even know what they are saying to God, but they can feel something while they do it. Its as if God is glorifying himself by speaking through you. If you ask me, that looks completely useless and not like any of the other things God does. It serves no need or purpose. Would he rather us not know what we are saying to him? Do we need to speak in another language to glorify him? No.

I know if I was willing to do the will of god and seek him with all my heart that he would reveal the truth about his words, and he did. But of course even some Pentecostals debate on certain details how and what speaking in tongues is. Some say all Christians will have this gift, it's a sign you are saved and filled with the spirit, some say it's only a gift for some chosen people and such.

I know it's all false. It has a purpose to translate. It serves a godly purpose. That gibberish doesn't.

I've read enough scripture, seen enough experiences and spoke with the Lord about it long enough to know.
What do you make of this?

1 Corinthians 14:2
For anyone who speaks in a tongue does not speak to people but to God. Indeed, no one understands them; they utter mysteries by the Spirit.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Who were these tongues speakers speaking to? (check the context)

Acts 10:46
For they heard them speaking in tongues and praising God. Then Peter said,

Acts 19:6
When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied.