Religion Generates Evil

[Adstar]

What is evil is a denial that the sex abuse crisis in the Catholic Church has ended.
What is evil is a denial that the sex abuse crisis in Protestantism has not ended, and blaming the Catholic Church over an accumulation of 40-70 year old scandals as a cover up for a Protestant problem they cannot resolve.
What is evil is a denial that the world and the media is at war with the Catholic Church, and to continue gathering wood for stake fires when there is almost no one to burn. This endless drum pounding over issues that have been resolved is just another form of persecution of a cultural nature.

In the light of the facts, this is hate speech.
What is evil is redefining "religion" into something sinister. It became a bad word by sheep stealing TV preachers in the '60's.
What is evil is when the legal system targets Catholicism, and ignores the overwhelming problem in public schools, where kids are raped daily and teachers are protected by their unions.
What is evil is when priests are sentenced to unrealistic prison terms based on no evidence.
This article was posted 2 days ago, it is not data going back to WWII:
PA GRAND JURY REPORT BASED ON ACCUSATIONS
If "Christian" hate cults spent as much of their resources on preaching the Gospel instead of unjustly bashing Catholicism, retaining members for them wouldn't be the problem that it is.

There is nothing more hateful to God then to defend the evil catholic church which has time and time and time again shown itself to be in opposition to the Gospel truth of God..

It is a testament to the tolerance of CC that people like you are allowed to post and put forward your defense of the abomination that is the catholic religion..

 

[epostle]

There is nothing more hateful to God then to defend the evil catholic church which has time and time and time again shown itself to be in opposition to the Gospel truth of God..

Same old nonsense. You refuse to tell the difference between doctrinal fidelity, promised by God, and sin. Sin cannot contaminate truth.

It is a testament to the tolerance of CC that people like you are allowed to post and put forward your defense of the abomination that is the catholic religion..

Because you try to strip me of my defense with your false history. Given your stupid ranting, I don't think you are capable of a civilized discussion. I always challenge false histories by asking for scholarly documentation, and I don't care if the historians appealed to are Protestant, because no Ph.D. historian would jeopardize their credentials by agreeing with your bigotry. That's why you would run from any of my challenges. I take facts over meaningless noise.

 

[pjharrison]

WOW! That really proves the existence of a trinity!
ONE means one minded in purpose.

Let's not derail the thread any more.

Ok, done.

 

[DudleyDorite]

I never said HE pal and the rest of your statement reeks of ignorance........You must be a Charles Russell-ite......or a False Jehovah's witness.....

Instead of posting snide, derogatory, sarcastic replies, why don't you be a big man and step up to the plate and discuss this like someone who knows what they're talking about?

You didn't say he? This is YOUR quote...

"And.....the H.S. is not nameless "Identified once by Christ" and identified numerous times by the personal pronoun HE.......you do understand grammar right...…?"

Don't be so ignorant.

Let it go. This isn't a trinity thread. But if someone starts one, I would gladly debunk the man made Catholic doctrine of Trinity.

 

[DudleyDorite]

I never said HE pal and the rest of your statement reeks of ignorance........You must be a Charles Russell-ite......or a False Jehovah's witness.....

I get that all the time. Typical response from a misled "holier than thou" Protestant. Most non-Trinitarians today are NOT JW'S.

 

[epostle]

Instead of posting snide, derogatory, sarcastic replies, why don't you be a big man and step up to the plate and discuss this like someone who knows what they're talking about?

You didn't say he? This is YOUR quote...


Don't be so ignorant.

Let it go. This isn't a trinity thread. But if someone starts one, I would gladly debunk the man made Catholic doctrine of Trinity.

That is IMPOSSIBLE. The Trinity, in seedling form, is found in Scripture, and developed over time. Development does not mean "change".

A revealed truth doesn't come from man, it comes from God who reveals it to Jesus who reveals it to His Apostles who are commissioned by Jesus to teach what they received from HIM. This is an orderly means that God uses to reveal Himself to us. God's truths can be traced from what has been divinely revealed from the top down, God>>Jesus>>Apostles>>all nations, not sideways (chaos).

Catholics didn't invent the Trinity, God did, and He used Catholics to develop and clarify the existing basics of the Trinity mainly because of heretics (starting with Arius). The Council of Nicae, 325, was about defending beliefs that were always there. Cults founded in the 18th century deny the Council of Nicae, refuse to read it's canons, deny it's authoritative verdict on the identity of Christ, and make junk history to justify their false doctrines.

The Trinity can not be argued on the basis of logic or human reasoning. It requires supernatural faith, not mere natural faith because It is a mystery. A mystery is something that is above our reasoning, but not contrary to it. No analogy is perfect, but that's all the human mind can handle. Jesus knew this, that's why He used metaphors and parables.

I avoid starting threads. The Trinity doesn't need a defense. It is accepted by Protestants, Catholics and Orthodox, and consistently taught for 2000 years. You need to defend the infallibility of an apostate Congregationalist minister who, in 1860, started his own church with a new brand of 3rd century Arianism.

​

 

[dcontroversal]

Instead of posting snide, derogatory, sarcastic replies, why don't you be a big man and step up to the plate and discuss this like someone who knows what they're talking about?

You didn't say he? This is YOUR quote...


Don't be so ignorant.

Let it go. This isn't a trinity thread. But if someone starts one, I would gladly debunk the man made Catholic doctrine of Trinity.

You must not understand English as well as you think you do.....try again and read with your glasses on this time and SLOWLY....

"And.....the H.S. is not nameless "Identified once by Christ" and identified numerous times by the personal pronoun HE.......you do understand grammar right...…?"

 

[DudleyDorite]

You must not understand English as well as you think you do.....try again and read with your glasses on this time and SLOWLY....

"And.....the H.S. is not nameless "Identified once by Christ" and identified numerous times by the personal pronoun HE.......you do understand grammar right...…?"

Your foolishness has earned you the honor of being the first on my ignore list!

 

[dcontroversal]

Your foolishness has earned you the honor of being the first on my ignore list!

Good..now I do not have to read your JW rigmarole....

 

[epostle]

Your foolishness has earned you the honor of being the first on my ignore list!

I didn't mean to frighten you off. You can't debunk a figment of your imagination.

I would gladly debunk the man made Catholic doctrine of Trinity.

You can try to debunk a non-existing card board caricature, it can't be done. Insults and bashing based on ignorance is an epidemic in here.

 

[Laish]

Good..now I do not have to read your JW rigmarole....

I not sure he is JW . JWs make up only about 35% of those that deny the trinity .
His posts are more in line with oneness folks . Not too sure though . Some of his stuff also looks like bible student movement.
Blessings
Bill

 

[mailmandan]

Your foolishness has earned you the honor of being the first on my ignore list!

Good..now I do not have to read your JW rigmarole....

Hey dcon, now that Dudley has you on ignore, can you still read his posts? Your posts will be invisible to him, but I was wondering if his posts are now invisible to you as well.

 

[epostle]

I not sure he is JW . JWs make up only about 35% of those that deny the trinity .
His posts are more in line with oneness folks . Not too sure though . Some of his stuff also looks like bible student movement.
Blessings
Bill

Thanks for the heads-up, Bill. Trinity deniers look the same at first. I find BS/JW's easy to refute. SDA's hide behind walls of text and videos. I think they are dangerous, partly due to mind control.
I haven't had much experience with Oneness P., not that I want any.

 

[Dino246]

Your foolishness has earned you the honor of being the first on my ignore list!

Wait, I thought I was first on your ignore list!

 

[dcontroversal]

Hey dcon, now that Dudley has you on ignore, can you still read his posts? Your posts will be invisible to him, but I was wondering if his posts are now invisible to you as well.

Ummm have not looked or seen any of his posts.....and too be frank....could care less....he misses the mark more than a blind man shooting into the wind....

 

[DudleyDorite]

Wait, I thought I was first on your ignore list!

No, you're not a punk like dcon.

 

[DudleyDorite]

I not sure he is JW . JWs make up only about 35% of those that deny the trinity .
His posts are more in line with oneness folks . Not too sure though . Some of his stuff also looks like bible student movement.
Blessings
Bill

I'm not JW or Oneness Pentecostal. I just do my own homework and find the Trinity a bunch of foolishness.
The trinity is right inline with pretribulationism. Full of fabrication and contradiction. They are both "from the other side."

 

[DudleyDorite]

I didn't mean to frighten you off. You can't debunk a figment of your imagination. You can try to debunk a non-existing card board caricature, it can't be done. Insults and bashing based on ignorance is an epidemic in here.

Sorry Epostle, that was meant for the illustrious dcon. I can deal with you.

You are welcome to debate me along with all of your trinitarian hordes here on CC about the man made doctrine of the trinity. I'd love to publicly debunk it.

 

[Deade]

Thanks for the heads-up, Bill. Trinity deniers look the same at first. I find BS/JW's easy to refute. SDA's hide behind walls of text and videos. I think they are dangerous, partly due to mind control.
I haven't had much experience with Oneness P., not that I want any.

He wasn't talking to you, he was talking to dcon. Why are you on here slamming cults and defending the Catholic Church. How could any Catholic make it to God's kingdom?

1 Cor. 6:9 "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,"

The Catholics gave the whole world lessons on idolatry, and they continue to do so daily.

 

[prove-all]

a. The Holy Spirit is identified under the personal pronoun HE

And.....the H.S. is not nameless "Identified once by Christ" and identified numerous times
by the personal pronoun HE.......you do understand grammar right......?

Do you understand grammer?

In Greek, as in English, the word spirit is neuter—neither masculine nor feminine in gender.
Pneuma is the Greek word meaning “spirit.” It is always grammatically neuter, properly
represented by the English pronoun “it” (John 1:32; Romans 8:16).

The Greek parakletos (comforter) is masculine in gender, so translators used the personal
pronouns he and him for the Greek masculine pronouns. In many languages, a word’s gender
has nothing to do with whether the thing itself is literally male or female. For example,
the Spanish word mesa (table) is feminine. Gender in language is a mere grammatical tool.

The bible says the Holy Spirit is the very power of God, not another person.

I have made the earth, the man and the beast that are upon the ground, by my great power
and by my outstretched arm, and have given it unto whom it seemed meet unto me.