Speaking in tongues

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,409
13,751
113
Even Jude is against your position. Jude is talking about the church, not individuals.

Jude:
3Dear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt compelled to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to God’s holy people. 4For certain individuals whose condemnation was written aboutb long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord.

.........
20But you, dear friends, by building yourselves up in your most holy faith and praying in the Holy Spirit,21keep yourselves in God’s love as you wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ to bring you to eternal life.

22Be merciful to those who doubt; 23save others by snatching them from the fire; to others show mercy, mixed with fear—hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh.


Again, Jude repeats what Paul has been saying in 1 Corinthians. None of these means that people are built when they pray words that they don't understand. Jude is writing to a Church and is urging them to build themselves (as the church not as individuals) bu ignoring those that slander amongst them. Nothing to suggest meaningless language.
Yes, Jude was writing to the church... made up of... individuals. You're grasping at straws, and the unsoundness of your position is becoming increasingly evident.
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
It already has a response, so it is logical (by your own standards). You can't have it both ways- Mark is the earliest promise of believers speaking in tongues, if it is fake even tongues are also fake.
That's not true.

But even if the longer ending of Mark 16 is authentic, you can't associate tongues with miracles in Matt 7. You're simply doing it because of your disbelief in speaking in tongues.
 

Noose

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2016
5,096
932
113
Yes, Jude was writing to the church... made up of... individuals. You're grasping at straws, and the unsoundness of your position is becoming increasingly evident.
So, Paul was talking about a church made of grapes when he talked about edification of the church?!

Self edification is not of the Holy spirit, the manifestation of the gifts of the holy spirit are for the common good.
Prophesy is for the common good and so is evangelism/teaching/healing- non is for self edification. Never heard of a healer healing themselves.
Speaking in tongues is no different, but the modern phenomenon of speaking unknown words is very different, maybe there's self edification with the modern tongues but i highly doubt based on what you say.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
It already has a response, so it is logical (by your own standards). You can't have it both ways- Mark is the earliest promise of believers speaking in tongues, if it is fake even tongues are also fake.
Even if Mark 16:9-20 is authentic . . . it is a promise to believers of what is to come - it is not a record of believers speaking in tongues . . . the FIRST record of people receiving the gift of holy spirit and manifesting speaking in tongues is in Acts.
 

Noose

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2016
5,096
932
113
That's not true.

But even if the longer ending of Mark 16 is authentic, you can't associate tongues with miracles in Matt 7. You're simply doing it because of your disbelief in speaking in tongues.
Nope.
There's no such thing as longer ending and shorter ending of Mark. It is where believers were promised all those things which manifested in Acts, if it is fake, then Acts is also fake.

I don't disbelieve the modern tongues, they are fake. Any thing that is works of signs and wonders today are fake because i know who has authority over the nations today and i know how he works.

The group in Matt 7 are Christians that are duped by the antichrist.
 

Noose

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2016
5,096
932
113
Even if Mark 16:9-20 is authentic . . . it is a promise to believers of what is to come - it is not a record of believers speaking in tongues . . . the FIRST record of people receiving the gift of holy spirit and manifesting speaking in tongues is in Acts.
That's right, it is a promise and the promise materialized in Acts, so it is authentic.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up (edifies). Edification is more than obtaining knowledge and/or understanding.
Way to dodge the point. Nothing is accomplished for Gods glory without knowledge. Emptiness does not glorify God.

Ec 1:2 Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Absolutely.

It would be wise for Christians to do what God wants us to do.

1 Cor 14:
5) I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.

37) If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.

...I can see what you're doing... You're trying yet another tactic to try and discredit speaking in tongues.

Don't let yourself be in this group, Roger:
1 Cor 14:
38) But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.
The measure by which you condemn others is the measure by which you shall be condemned.

1 Cor 14:5 Paul is writing that he would that all new believers spoke in tongues like those in the book of Acts. This would be evidence that they actually got saved. Paul is not supporting the modern contention that believers spoke in tongues on subsequent occasions. We do not have evidence that anyone ever spoke in tongues more than at the time they were saved or in the case in Acts when they initially were filled of the Holy Spirit to testify of Christ.

My tactic as you put it is to demonstrate from scripture that you have a completely faulty concept of tongues in the NT church especially post apostolic period.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
Nope.
There's no such thing as longer ending and shorter ending of Mark. It is where believers were promised all those things which manifested in Acts, if it is fake, then Acts is also fake.

I don't disbelieve the modern tongues, they are fake. Any thing that is works of signs and wonders today are fake because i know who has authority over the nations today and i know how he works.

The group in Matt 7 are Christians that are duped by the antichrist.
One day you'll know, Noose.

You'll know that speaking in tongues is not fake.
You'll know that we're not in the trib yet.
You'll know that the antichrist is not active yet.
You'll know that prayer != needs.

And many more.

I hope that day comes before the return of Christ.
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
The measure by which you condemn others is the measure by which you shall be condemned.
We all should heed those words, Roger...

1 Cor 14:5 Paul is writing that he would that all new believers spoke in tongues like those in the book of Acts.
The word "new" is not there. You added it.

This would be evidence that they actually got saved.
It still is.

Paul is not supporting the modern contention that believers spoke in tongues on subsequent occasions.
Of course he is.

1 Cor 14:
5) I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.

Eph 6:
18) Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;

We do not have evidence that anyone ever spoke in tongues more than at the time they were saved or in the case in Acts when they initially were filled of the Holy Spirit to testify of Christ.
Does Paul himself count?

1 Cor 14:
18) I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:

My tactic as you put it is to demonstrate from scripture that you have a completely faulty concept of tongues in the NT church especially post apostolic period.
Your tactic has failed because it's based on a faulty premise.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
We all should heed those words, Roger...


The word "new" is not there. You added it.


It still is.


Of course he is.

1 Cor 14:
5) I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.

Eph 6:
18) Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;


Does Paul himself count?

1 Cor 14:
18) I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:


You have failed to do so.
Paul never states that he spoke in unknown tongues. Paul spoke in more than one known tongue. Paul was educated as a Pharisee not as a fisherman.

Confuse praying in the Holy Spirit as praaying in tongues. That is a misconception finding it's roots in new age mysticism not in Christ.

The word of God is the final arbitor in matters Spiritual.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
Paul never states that he spoke in unknown tongues.
1 Cor 14:
18) I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:

Paul spoke in more than one known tongue.
Yes. He also spoke in tongues.

Paul was educated as a Pharisee not as a fisherman.

Confuse praying in the Holy Spirit as praaying in tongues. That is a misconception finding it's roots in new age mysticism not in Christ.
1 Cor 14:
14) For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.
15) What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.
16) Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?

Praying in the spirit IS speaking in tongues.

The word of God is the final arbitor in matters Spiritual.
Agreed. You should pay attention to what it says.
 

Noose

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2016
5,096
932
113
One day you'll know, Noose.

You'll know that speaking in tongues is not fake.
You'll know that we're not in the trib yet.
You'll know that the antichrist is not active yet.
You'll know that prayer != needs.

And many more.

I hope that day comes before the return of Christ.
Shrume, my journey has been long with many 'one days' along it:
-I used to believe and even spoke in tongues; 'one day' came and i stopped
-I used to believe in future trib; one day came and i stopped because i now know better
-I used to believe all those positions there are about antichrist; one day came and i stopped because what i know now you can't even imagine

All i'm saying is that i have grown and i'm still growing never to look back. I'm hoping for more 'one days' but with regards to bigger things.
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
Shrume, my journey has been long with many 'one days' along it:
-I used to believe and even spoke in tongues; 'one day' came and i stopped
-I used to believe in future trib; one day came and i stopped because i now know better
-I used to believe all those positions there are about antichrist; one day came and i stopped because what i know now you can't even imagine

All i'm saying is that i have grown and i'm still growing never to look back. I'm hoping for more 'one days' but with regards to bigger things.
Time will tell, Noose.
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
Shrume,
We are different, you are shooting in the dark hoping to get the target
I am not shooting in the dark at all. Everything I believe concerning tongues and other topics comes from the Bible.

i know what i'm saying.
I believe you know what you are saying. I also am convinced you are dead wrong in many of the things you have said.

Trust me.
Emphatically, no.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
1 Cor 14:
18) I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than ye all:
Yes. He also spoke in tongues.
Offered without support. Paul does not say he spoke in unknown tongues. Tongues are languages and human languages in the context of human interactions.
1 Cor 14:
14) For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.
15) What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.
16) Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?

Praying in the spirit IS speaking in tongues.
You have the meaning of this passage completely confused. Praying in the Holy Spirit is not praying in tongues. Paul offers that praying in his spirit his human spirit with unknown tongues, a tongue he does not know is unfruitful.
Agreed. You should pay attention to what it says.
Seriously? You change the definitions of words and you say pay attention? Try to find a passage that actually means what you want it to say.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
464
83
Offered without support. Paul does not say he spoke in unknown tongues.
The context of 1 Cor 14 is the manifestation of speaking in tongues, and speaking in tongues is speaking a language you do not know (1 Cor 14:2, 14). Therefore when Paul said he spoke in tongues more than the whole Corinthian church, he was talking about the manifestation of speaking in tongues, speaking a language he did not know.

Tongues are languages and human languages in the context of human interactions.
When a person speaks in tongues, it can be either a language of men or angels (1 Cor 13:1).

Also, the primary use of speaking in tongues is not for "human interactions", it is speaking to God.

1 Cor 14:
2) For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.

You have the meaning of this passage completely confused. Praying in the Holy Spirit is not praying in tongues.
That is precisely what it is, Roger.

Paul offers that praying in his spirit his human spirit with unknown tongues, a tongue he does not know is unfruitful.
A person cannot pray in tongues with his "human spirit".

Seriously? You change the definitions of words and you say pay attention? Try to find a passage that actually means what you want it to say.
Were you looking in a mirror when you wrote that? You should have been... :)
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
25,409
13,751
113
So, Paul was talking about a church made of grapes when he talked about edification of the church?!
Try being relevant.

Self edification is not of the Holy spirit, the manifestation of the gifts of the holy spirit are for the common good.
Prophesy is for the common good and so is evangelism/teaching/healing- non is for self edification. Never heard of a healer healing themselves.
Speaking in tongues is no different, but the modern phenomenon of speaking unknown words is very different, maybe there's self edification with the modern tongues but i highly doubt based on what you say.
Find in Scripture a single instance of "edify" or any cognate which is clearly used in a negative sense.

Until you do, you have no reason to conclude that in 1 Cor 14:4 it is used in a negative sense.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
The context of 1 Cor 14 is the manifestation of speaking in tongues, and speaking in tongues is speaking a language you do not know (1 Cor 14:2, 14). Therefore when Paul said he spoke in tongues more than the whole Corinthian church, he was talking about the manifestation of speaking in tongues, speaking a language he did not know.
There is nothing in the passage to support that conclusion. You are going way outside of any reasonable biblical exegesis. Paul never said he spoke in a language he did not understand. Paul did repeatedly say that speaking in a language you do not understand is unfruitful.
When a person speaks in tongues, it can be either a language of men or angels (1 Cor 13:1).

Also, the primary use of speaking in tongues is not for "human interactions", it is speaking to God.
More speculative fantasy. There is nothing to support angel tongues. It is hyperbole or over exaggeration to make an illustration. Read the verse in context and forsake the pretext.
1 Cor 14:
2) For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; howbeit in the spirit he speaketh mysteries.
Context. Paul is not praising this supposed activity. Speaking without knowledge and understanding makes one appear well less than wise.

Pr 17:28 Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.
That is precisely what it is, Roger.
A person cannot pray in tongues with his "human spirit".
Wow you are way out there in the woods.
Were you looking in a mirror when you wrote that? You should have been... :)
Try looking into the mirror of the word of God.

For the cause of Christ
Roger