maybe you should be clear as to who
you are saying is denying the trintity . Because you are not speaking to me .
Not sure where I ever told anyone, that they was denying the trinity ?
maybe you should be clear as to who
you are saying is denying the trintity . Because you are not speaking to me .
in context to Christian holidays they were done to bring commemoration to Biblical events of importance . Christmas = Christ mass, Easter = resurrection of Christ and others.Other than the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, who gave the original sabbath commandment!
You seem to have missed the point. The purpose of the sabbath was primarily total avoidance of daily labor, but it was more than that. It was supposed to be a day dedicated (sanctified) to God. Which ultimately made it a day of worship for Jews who attended synagogues on sabbath days.
But Christ went one major step further. He deliberately healed on sabbath days to show the Jews that good works done on the sabbath were consistent with God's concept of the sabbath.
Furthermore He Himself declared that He was Lord of the sabbath, which meant that He had the divine right to determine the meaning of the sabbath. God had already allowed the priests to work on sabbath days, meaning that spiritual and godly activity was perfectly acceptable on the sabbath.
So the PRINCIPLES of sabbath-keeping were transferred to the Lord's Day (which is the first day of the week, and which we call Sunday incidentally). Christ arose on the first day of the week (not on the preceding sabbath, since the sabbath was also God's day of rest in the beginning, and the first fruits, which were a type of Christ, were offered on the morrow AFTER the sabbath). And because of His resurrection, and the fact that He was worshiped by His apostles on that day, the Christian day of worship has been rightly termed "the Christian sabbath".
Sabbatarians today denigrate the Lord's Day, which in itself is a sin. Secondly they forget that the sabbath was given to Israel, and along with the sabbath the entire Mosaic Law must be obeyed (which they cannot do even if they tried). Thirdly, they also forget that when the Gentiles were given instructions about which commandments in the Law of Moses were still applicable to them, SABBATH-KEEPING WAS EXCLUDED.
that is one of the worst translations there is in the bible,
people should know this with any quick study.
really what does the word Easter refer to in Acts ? do not words have systematic range of meaning ? is not the word Easter in context to a day observed known as "Passover" ? And the context of Easter in the Christian Church has been for some time now in direct remembrance to the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ.
I agree. I will go as far as to say that even Translators are biased or make errors seeing they are fallible humans ! but the consequences of their mistakes can be devastating....if it were not for God's Holy Spirit helping out the obedient and humble !
Where did God, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit tell us Not to keep the Sabbath?if you have a sprit telling you to keep the Sabbath and Jesus was raised on a Sabbath , then, it is not the Holy Sprit. the Holy Sprit would not give misinformation.
Where did God, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit tell us Not to keep the Sabbath?
Is the holy spirit, Father and Son all equal separate entities?
Other than the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, who gave the original sabbath commandment!
You seem to have missed the point.
So the PRINCIPLES of sabbath-keeping were transferred to the Lord's Day (which is the first day of the week, and which we call Sunday incidentally).
Sabbatarians today denigrate the Lord's Day, which in itself is a sin.
Thirdly, they also forget that when the Gentiles were given instructions about which commandments in the Law of Moses were still applicable to them, SABBATH-KEEPING WAS EXCLUDED.
You wrote this in response to my comment identifying Judaizers. Are you suggesting that Judaizers were merely trying to force gentile believers to follow Talmudic laws?
If so, your position is incorrect. Circumcision is not of the Talmud, but of the Torah. The Judaizers' primary argument was that gentile believers were to be circumcised, according to the Torah. This has nothing to do with the Talmud.
I believe you have again misused the quoting system. there are a lot of words in the quote box attributed to me that I did not write.
Dan_473 said:
again, if one just quotes scriptures, there is no question.
But if one adds their own commentary, then they are no longer saying "just what the Bible says".
there was no Torah in Genesis. the Law came through Moses. Jesus said so Himself
Why would God have a law for Israel and a separate law for gentiles?gentiles were never under the Law of Moses. only Israel. there is no N.T. command for gentiles to keep the Sabbath. read the book of Acts.
so, your questions are from a flawed premise. no Law of Moses for gentiles. there are plenty of instructional verses in the N.T., for all believers . why not just follow those??
thats strange it is my understanding the passover is about JesusThe instructions for Passover are found in Exodus chapter 12, which looks nothing like the way Easter is celebrated.
And its all about Yeshua(Jesus).
Why would God have a law for Israel and a separate law for gentiles?
How does that even make sense ?
Exodus 12:49 There shall be one law for the native and for the stranger who sojourns among you.”
thats strange it is my understanding the passover is about Jesus![]()
So the context of Easter Biblically is about Jesus then ? As it was stated it has nothing to do with pagans .Yes. The Passover is all about yeshua(Jesus) , i'm sorry I wasn't very clear.
Look up the origins of Easter. how does it have anything to do with the messiah?So the context of Easter Biblically is about Jesus then ? As it was stated it has nothing to do with pagans .
because the word also means Passover as it has been for sometimew now also it speaks of spring and from the word Pascha (Greek, Latin) or Resurrection Sunday, which historically it has been known as . I find it funny the historical normitive for easter has been the resurrection of Christ. for the past 52 years it has been so for me and my father, and his father and on and on. Only legelist church folk bring up this other stuff which I maight add even the lost don't know of it LOL The long standing historical context to the word easter has been the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. and the early Church has that well documented.Look up the origins of Easter. how does it have anything to do with the messiah?
="Dan_473, post: 3631431, member: 190874"]Studyman,
Yes, I'm learning this new system, try this:
That is why it's called "Prophesy" and not just reading. And that's why Prophesy is called a gift that everyone doesn't have, but should strive for.
9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.
10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
John 6:53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. (Well, there goes the "come as you are" doctrine)
There is a true meaning of this scripture.
Every person on this forum knows Jesus isn't telling us to physically eat His Flesh and drink His Blood. But that's what it says, right Dan? Are you telling me that Jesus is saying we should find His Flesh and eat it before we can enter His Kingdom? Or is this another reason to discount much of the Bible's Words altogether as not truth?
But there is another option. Maybe the Jesus is right and the meaning is Spiritual, and this Spiritual meaning is granted to some and not to others?
How can a person receive the true meaning of this scripture? By attending a church and believing the words of a preacher that transgresses the Commandments of God by their own religious traditions? That didn't work for the people who listened to the Mainstream Preachers of Christ's time. Why would it work for you?
As I said before, everyone on this forum Prophesies Dan. Even you. If you want to act as if you don't, well honesty can be a hard thing, especially with ones self.
John 14:
15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
It's not an easy thing to truly "believe" in the Word which became Flesh.