So you're saying that you need evidence in order to have faith?
No.
So you're saying that you need evidence in order to have faith?
I think you misunderstood me, I meant that faith does not hold up to scrutiny. Evidence should hold up to scrutiny, therefore faith is not evidence. Sorry, English is not my first language.If evidence doesn't hold up to scrutiny, then how is anyone ever convicted of a crime?
I think you misunderstood me, I meant that faith does not hold up to scrutiny. Evidence should hold up to scrutiny, therefore faith is not evidence. Sorry, English is not my first language.
If, for example, a Hindu says "I have faith that Vishnu is my lord and saviour", does that make Vishnu true?
I have never claimed not to believe the truth, nor that I don't believe in the LORD.
While it is true that I do not claim to be a Christian, can you show me in the scriptures where a person must claim to be a Christian?
I don't know. You have a good point there.But how can a blind man see the evidence in order to state that it does not hold up to scrutiny?
I don't know. You have a good point there.
But how can a blind man see the evidence in order to state that it does not hold up to scrutiny?
What do you mean by "We "walk" or understand him"?It has more to do with the spiritually blind, deaf and dumb .We walk or understand Him, as the faith of the unseen, faithful Creator .
Isaiah 29:18And in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the book, and the eyes of the blind shall see out of obscurity, and out of darkness.
Its the whole crux of his ministry
John 9:39And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see "not" might see; and that they which see might be made blind.
Man looks upon the outside. God looks upon the heart .He alone can soften it.
NoI agree with you. Did you read the rest of the thread?
Also why does Jesus say that "they which see might be made blind"?
Ah that's a good one!
Other translations say it more like...that those who think they can see might be made blind.
Which ties into what we were talking about earlier. Men don't know they're blind. They think they can see. Since they think they can see, they certainly aren't going to ask a physician to heal them.
That is not entirely true. Our school books are filled with scientific theory and the theory is set forth as proven fact.Whereas scientists say "We don't know how it happened." and stop there.
Similarly, it is only men who see they are destitute who will ask for help. Rich men (or men who think they're rich) certainly won't ask for help because they think they don't need help.
Maybe in the US, but that is not my experience. At least not about things that haven't been proven beyond reasonable doubt.That is not entirely true. Our school books are filled with scientific theory and the theory is set forth as proven fact.