KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
We get these ideas from reading the bible. I don't think that every time the number 7 is used in the bible it's always about completion but the general sense is that the number 7 in the bible represents completeness.

This is the point I'm trying to make, I'm not saying one way or another about what the end of the world was.

Any proof of that general sense?

Any proof that its 7times and not 10times in the KJV?

What about NIV having "last days" 14times. Coincidence?
 
Your personal belief is not a standard for the common church...

And if you believe that 7 means completness, it should be 77, not 66. Be consistent.
I think God is sovereign and dictates how many books end up as scripture. Maybe not though, mabe he wanted 72 but the church decided 66 was better lol.

Most people understand that the number 7 means completeness.
 
... which are in all Bibles, not just the KJV. The problem is not that you have a standard. The problem is that you toss your standard aside when it's not convenient for you to apply it.

Aside from word and phrase counts, every assertion you make for the KJV being inspired can be applied to other translations. I consider such counts irrelevant because it hasn't been proven that they exist in the original languages.
Give some examples that really stand out like translating pascha as Easter in the book of Acts as the KV translators did to mark the one and only occurence of pascha after it had been fulfilled.
 
The phrase “Holy Spirit” denotes a name, as I stated previously. A name refers to a person.
That name is used but one time in the Authorized.

Why is the phrase “Holy Spirit” used once?
To avoid any confusion as to function and as to whom the Holy Ghost is.

Do you know why the name Holy Ghost is used?

I don't hold the KJV as inspired, pure, or perfect, so I am quite ambivalent about why it uses "Holy Spirit" only once. I suspect this has no real meaning and is an oversight of the KJV translators.

Incidentally, "Holy Spirit" appears once with that exact capitalization. It appears seven times overall. The Greek doesn't have different words behind "ghost" and "spirit" so I see no reason why the English should have such.
 
I think God is sovereign and dictates how many books end up as scripture. Maybe not though, mabe he wanted 72 but the church decided 66 was better lol.

Most people understand that the number 7 means completeness.

If 7 means completness, a complete Bible must be 77 books. Logically.

I do not know why are you trying to avoid conclusions of your own arguments...
 
I'm interested, give me some examples.

Well, my pastor only uses a KJV, but he nor the church is KJVO. Some use an NIV, others use the ESV. One other member solely uses a KJV.

Now, I usually take my NASB to church with many. Many verses he reads read word-for-word with his KJV. Others are the same, except my NASB may say ’know’ where the KJV uses ‘knowest’, ‘knoweth’.
 
Give some examples that really stand out like translating pascha as Easter in the book of Acts as the KV translators did to mark the one and only occurence of pascha after it had been fulfilled.

Easter is about a pagan fertility goddess.
 
You are mistaken. You are probably thinking that phrases suc as, holy Spirit...etc... equate, but they don’t.
”Holy Spirit” is a name, not a descriptive phrase.

Here's your statement restated:

"Holy Spirit" is not a descriptive phrase.
Therefore, the Holy Spirit is not "spirit"; or,
the Holy Spirit is not holy; or,
the Holy Spirit is neither holy nor "spirit".

Any other blasphemy you wish to add to that before you are written off as a heretic?

Holy Spirit (proper noun) is the name of a holy (adj.) spirit (improper noun), but holy spirit is not a name (proper noun) at all. Joseppi may not have stated this correctly, but he's not wrong nonetheless.

His point I believe, and mine also, is that one must be careful when entering key words in word search programs, and also careful when analyzing the results.
 
Maybe by the wisdom of this world.:)

7 means completeness... it just is.

There isn't a single verse in Scripture that states that "seven" or "7" means "completeness". While plausible and logical, it is still only an inference and as such should not be the basis for doctrinal assertions. It is just as plausible to consider 3, 4 and 12 as meaning "completeness" for each is used in that sense. It is far better to take the approach that 7 may be used to signify "completeness" in certain cases. I would suggest that anything that requires stretching to make it fit... doesn't fit. That includes any word counts in English.
 
Holy Spirit (proper noun) is the name of a holy (adj.) spirit (improper noun), but holy spirit is not a name (proper noun) at all. Joseppi may not have stated this correctly, but he's not wrong nonetheless.

His point I believe, and mine also, is that one must be careful when entering key words in word search programs, and also careful when analyzing the results.

I agree... and when Joseppi learns not to be a dogmatic, closed-minded, insulting jack-donkey about every little issue, then I might give him the benefit of the doubt.
 
If 7 means completness, a complete Bible must be 77 books. Logically.

I do not know why are you trying to avoid conclusions of your own arguments...
I'm not avoiding conclusions of my own arguments. The number 7 indicates completeness, that doesn't mean everything completed in the bible has the number 7 attached to it.