I didn’t say that.Coming from someone who said the Holy Spirit is only a name.![]()
It it is interesting to read how some treat people as falsely as they do the Authorized Holy Bible.
I didn’t say that.Coming from someone who said the Holy Spirit is only a name.![]()
I'm interested, give me some examples.I can see that in the KJV, ESV, NIV, NASB, YLT, NKJV, &c.
We get these ideas from reading the bible. I don't think that every time the number 7 is used in the bible it's always about completion but the general sense is that the number 7 in the bible represents completeness.
This is the point I'm trying to make, I'm not saying one way or another about what the end of the world was.
Did they translate the same original word differently to make that number?In NIV, "last day/s" is present 14times. Its 2*7.
Huh... now what, we have another inspiration pattern?
Did they translate the same original word differently to make that number?
I think God is sovereign and dictates how many books end up as scripture. Maybe not though, mabe he wanted 72 but the church decided 66 was better lol.Your personal belief is not a standard for the common church...
And if you believe that 7 means completness, it should be 77, not 66. Be consistent.
I can read a dictionary.I do not know Hebrew, so I cannot tell.
How do you know that the KJV translated different original words, if you cant read Hebrew?
Give some examples that really stand out like translating pascha as Easter in the book of Acts as the KV translators did to mark the one and only occurence of pascha after it had been fulfilled.... which are in all Bibles, not just the KJV. The problem is not that you have a standard. The problem is that you toss your standard aside when it's not convenient for you to apply it.
Aside from word and phrase counts, every assertion you make for the KJV being inspired can be applied to other translations. I consider such counts irrelevant because it hasn't been proven that they exist in the original languages.
The phrase “Holy Spirit” denotes a name, as I stated previously. A name refers to a person.
That name is used but one time in the Authorized.
Why is the phrase “Holy Spirit” used once?
To avoid any confusion as to function and as to whom the Holy Ghost is.
Do you know why the name Holy Ghost is used?
I think God is sovereign and dictates how many books end up as scripture. Maybe not though, mabe he wanted 72 but the church decided 66 was better lol.
Most people understand that the number 7 means completeness.
Maybe by the wisdom of this world.If 7 means completness, a complete Bible must be 77 books. Logically.
I do not know why do you try to avoid conclusions of your own arguments...
Maybe by the wisdom of this world.
7 means completeness... it just is.
I'm interested, give me some examples.
Give some examples that really stand out like translating pascha as Easter in the book of Acts as the KV translators did to mark the one and only occurence of pascha after it had been fulfilled.
You are mistaken. You are probably thinking that phrases suc as, holy Spirit...etc... equate, but they don’t.
”Holy Spirit” is a name, not a descriptive phrase.
Here's your statement restated:
"Holy Spirit" is not a descriptive phrase.
Therefore, the Holy Spirit is not "spirit"; or,
the Holy Spirit is not holy; or,
the Holy Spirit is neither holy nor "spirit".
Any other blasphemy you wish to add to that before you are written off as a heretic?
Maybe by the wisdom of this world.
7 means completeness... it just is.
Holy Spirit (proper noun) is the name of a holy (adj.) spirit (improper noun), but holy spirit is not a name (proper noun) at all. Joseppi may not have stated this correctly, but he's not wrong nonetheless.
His point I believe, and mine also, is that one must be careful when entering key words in word search programs, and also careful when analyzing the results.
I tried to check it in the NIV but I could find any tools that would let me search for pneuma in the NIV, it kept changing over to the KJV.So you can verify it for NIV too.
I'm not avoiding conclusions of my own arguments. The number 7 indicates completeness, that doesn't mean everything completed in the bible has the number 7 attached to it.If 7 means completness, a complete Bible must be 77 books. Logically.
I do not know why are you trying to avoid conclusions of your own arguments...