KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#2,241
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#2,241
trofimus said:
What about general church and her creeds?

What about "the standard is the verifiable truth", no matter where it is written in?

Let us not limit ourselves.
Click to expand...
If the church and creeds match the bible then they are ok to believe.
The only possible standard is the standard that God breathed. Uninspired translations are just mans work and they are fallible.
 
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#2,242
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#2,242
KJV1611 said:
Trof the KJV translators translated the Greek and Hebrew for spirit differently so that the word count for Holy Ghost would = 90 and the word count for Holy Spirit would = 7.

Do you think this is coincidence or by design?
Click to expand...
1611 or 1769? Cambridge or Oxford?

There is not just one KJV.

I found 91 and 10. NO idea which KJV version it used.
 
Last edited:
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#2,243
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#2,243
KJV1611 said:
If the church and creeds match the bible then they are ok to believe.
The only possible standard is the standard that God breathed. Uninspired translations are just mans work and they are fallible.
Click to expand...
Also our minds are fallible.

Even if we had a perfect text, our comprehension would still lead to many errors. Isolation of verses, misunderstanding of context etc.

We need more than just book. We need to be led by the living God.
 
Lucy-Pevensie

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
#2,244
Dec 20, 2017
9,388
5,729
113
#2,244
KJV1611 said:
The standard is the inspired inerrant word of God? Now the question is which bible is the inspired inerrant word of God. :(
I've only seen one so far.
Click to expand...

You don't get to ignore this. "the inspired inerrant word of God" The King James Version.
Does the KJV teach that God is plural?



Lucy-Pevensie said:
Daniel 4:8 King James Version (KJV)

8 But at the last Daniel came in before me, whose name was Belteshazzar, according to the name of my God, and in whom is the spirit of the holy gods: and before him I told the dream, saying,


Daniel 4:8 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

8 But at the last Daniel came in before me, whose name was Belteshazzar, according to the name of my god, and in whom is the spirit of the holy gods: and before him I told the dream, saying,

*


Daniel 4:9 King James Version (KJV)


9 O Belteshazzar, master of the magicians, because I know that the spirit of the holy gods is in thee, and no secret troubleth thee, tell me the visions of my dream that I have seen, and the interpretation thereof.


Daniel 4:9 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

9 O Belteshazzar, master of the magicians, because I know that the spirit of the holy gods is in thee, and no secret troubleth thee, tell me the visions of my dream that I have seen, and the interpretation thereof.

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)KJV reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press, the Crown’s patentee in the UK.

*

Daniel 4:18 King James Version (KJV)

18 This dream I king Nebuchadnezzar have seen. Now thou, O Belteshazzar, declare the interpretation thereof, forasmuch as all the wise men of my kingdom are not able to make known unto me the interpretation: but thou art able; for the spirit of the holy gods is in thee.


Daniel 4:18 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

18 This dream I king Nebuchadnezzar have seen. Now thou, O Belteshazzar, declare the interpretation thereof, forasmuch as all the wise men of my kingdom are not able to make known unto me the interpretation: but thou art able; for the spirit of the holy gods is in thee.

*


Daniel 5:11 King James Version (KJV)


11 There is a man in thy kingdom,in whom is the spirit of the holy gods; and in the days of thy father light and understanding and wisdom, likethe wisdom of the gods, was found in him; whom the king Nebuchadnezzar thy father, the king, I say, thy father, made master of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayers;


Daniel 5:11 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)

11 There is a man in thy kingdom,in whom is the spirit of the holy gods; and in the days of thy father light and understanding and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods, was found in him; whom the king Nebuchadnezzar thy father, the king, I say, thy father, made master of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, andsoothsayers;

Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)KJV reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press, the Crown’s patentee in the UK.
Click to expand...
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#2,245
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#2,245
trofimus said:
1611 or 1769? Cambridge or Oxford?

There is not just one KJV.

I found 91 and 10. NO idea which KJV version it used.
Click to expand...
The same pattern is in 1611 and 1769. I don't know about Cambridge or Oxford because I'm not aware of the differnces.

What sofware did you use to find 91?
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#2,246
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#2,246
trofimus said:
Also our minds are fallible.

Even if we had a perfect text, our comprehension would still lead to many errors. Isolation of verses, misunderstanding of context etc.

We need more than just book. We need to be led by the living God.
Click to expand...
I agree, a perfect book without the Holy Spirit is worhless. Just look at the Pharisees.
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#2,247
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#2,247
Lucy-Pevensie said:
You don't get to ignore this. "the inspired inerrant word of God" The King James Version.
Does the KJV teach that God is plural?
Click to expand...
I wasn't ignoring you, the post wasn't addressed to me plus I didn't know what you were getting at.

Those are Nebuchadnezzar words, it's what he believed.
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#2,248
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#2,248
Do you guys know of any software that counts words in the newer translation i.e. the NIV or NASB?
 
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#2,249
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#2,249
Lucy-Pevensie said:
You don't get to ignore this. "the inspired inerrant word of God" The King James Version.
Does the KJV teach that God is plural?
Click to expand...
OUch, that must be a painful reading for the KJVO. So many verses with "gods" in Daniel.
 
Lucy-Pevensie

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
#2,252
Dec 20, 2017
9,388
5,729
113
#2,252
KJV1611 said:
I wasn't ignoring you, the post wasn't addressed to me plus I didn't know what you were getting at.

Those are Nebuchadnezzar words, it's what he believed.
Click to expand...



Exactly! The same for the NIV. Which is what you've been told again and again and again. You can't have a double standard!
 
N

nddreamer

Senior Member
#2,255
Aug 31, 2017
142
4
18
#2,255
The Babylonians had a dozen gods. That's how they thought and that's how they spoke.
 
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#2,256
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#2,256
nddreamer said:
The Babylonians had a dozen gods. That's how they thought and that's how they spoke.
Click to expand...
If I understand KJV1611 correctly, he is not saying that the babylonian king said "son of God", he thinks that the KJV fixed it to be a better reading, even though not historically correct.

But I may be wrong, I have a problem understanding what is the supposed theological problem for us with wrong ideas of a pagan king :)
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#2,257
Jan 18, 2016
7,209
1,815
113
#2,257
preston39 said:
h...,

Where did you get that from? Not me...if that is your insinuation......please refer to fact.

You will not be allowed to spin with me...here.
Click to expand...
Here is a direct quote from your previous post..... Did I (and probably everyone else who read this) misunderstand your insinuation? No spinning required. To me, it's simple reading comprehension. If I misunderstood your statement, I will happily retract my reply.

Since we see justification of other re-writes,....what will be your reaction to that one?
Click to expand...
 
KJV1611

KJV1611

Banned
#2,259
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
#2,259
trofimus said:
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/k/kjv/simple.html

It returns 91 for Holy Ghost and 10 for Holy Spirit.
Click to expand...
That search program searches the KJV and the apocrypha. 4Ezra is where the extra occurences comes from.

4Ezra.14


  1. [22] But if I have found grace before thee, send the Holy Ghost into me, and I shall write all that hath been done in the world since the beginning, which were written in thy law, that men may find thy path, and that they which will live in the latter days may live.
 
Last edited:
trofimus

trofimus

Senior Member
#2,260
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#2,260
KJV1611 said:
That search program searches the KJV and the apocrypha. 4Ezra is where the extra occurences comes from.

4Ezra.14


  1. [22] But if I have found grace before thee, send the Holy Ghost into me, and I shall write all that hath been done in the world since the beginning, which were written in thy law, that men may find thy path, and that they which will live in the latter days may live.
Click to expand...
"The KJV and the apocrypha" - Apocrypha are in the KJV.

And thats only one occurence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.