KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
KJV1611 said:
I'm sorry I left off the s on gospel... gospels is what I meant. You do realize all of those guys were on the cross for 6 hours. And NO Mark is not generalizing, he's giving a completely different account
Click to expand...

When we compare synoptic gospels, we can find many differences in details. Its like two angels or one angel in the tomb, different versions of Our Father prayer etc.
 
trofimus said:
When we compare synoptic gospels, we can find many differences in details. Its like two angels or one angel in the tomb, different versions of Our Father prayer etc.
Click to expand...

Or 3 one at the entrance, two appearing inside the tomb,

.
.
.
 
KJV1611 said:
At the start of the crucifixtion both thieves reviled Jesus, does that sound like something a saved person would do on their death bed?


Mark 15:32 King James Version (KJV)

32 Let Christ the King of Israel descend now from the cross, that we may see and believe. And they that were crucified with him reviled him.
Click to expand...


It isn't how you start but how you finish that counts :)
 
trofimus said:
When we compare synoptic gospels, we can find many differences in details. Its like two angels or one angel in the tomb, different versions of Our Father prayer etc.
Click to expand...
I've actually researched that and wrote about on this forum. There are no discrepancies there.... all things are established at the mouth of 2 or 3 witnesses, so there were 3 who witnessed his resurrection but I can't remember the details at the moment but I will try to find that post I made.
 
KJV1611 said:
Which is part is unchristian -
Click to expand...

There are two Christs. Then you doubled down and said the Christ you have is not the same Christ others have if they don’t read the KJV.

I am going to be blunt...you have the spirit of anti-Christ all through you.
 
SovereignGrace said:
There are two Christs. Then you doubled down and said the Christ you have is not the same Christ others have if they don’t read the KJV.

I am going to be blunt...you have the spirit of anti-Christ all through you.
Click to expand...
Is your view of Christ the same as my view of Christ?
 
SovereignGrace said:
Not your two Christs view. No.
Click to expand...
You're not understanding what I'm talking about and I realize it's my fault because I'm not communicating it well. All I'm saying is that there is the literal Spirit of Christ indwelling all believers but their is also an image of Christ in our minds. That's our view of Christ and who he is and that varies depending on what we've been taught and what we have read about him. That's all I'm saying and I'm sorry that I have caused you so much grief over this.

Edit: I would much rather be your friend rather than your enemy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trofimus
posthuman said:
could someone who believes it is so, tell me how is KJV's rendition of Hebrews 4:8 perfect and every other version corrupt?

KJV: "if Jesus had given them rest, he would not afterward have spoken of another day"

most every other version: "if Joshua had given them rest .."

context is Israel did not receive enter into rest when they entered Canaan, because of unbelief, and then later through David in the Psalms God appoints another day for rest, "today" --- to me it looks like both a blasphemous statement in KJV to say Jesus was unable to give rest, and an obvious mistranslation given the timeline of events the context is describing.

i know some of you here say everything in KJV is 100% perfect, so how do you make sense of this?
Click to expand...

I would argue that there is no true rest apart from Jesus Christ and the rest being spoken of here is something that Joshua would have been incapable of giving to them.

[FONT=&quot]Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.

Matthew 11:28

[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
 
So, KJV1611, have you responded to my question which version is perfect, if 1769 or 1611? :)
 
trofimus said:
So, KJV1611, have you responded to my question which version is perfect, if 1769 or 1611? :)
Click to expand...
I thought I did but maybe not. I think both are perect but I prefer 1769 because it's easier to read. I've not noticed any differences between the two.
 
Icetech said:
I guess I should have searched the thread. I hope this guy didn't get banned because of this LOL because he is absolutely right!
Click to expand...
No he didn't get banned. He's still suffering from a maniacal obsession with numbers and the KJV. No digit is safe from the count.


abacus-smiley-emoticon.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back