There is only one requirement to be saved. Not many, and that is to have faith in Jesus (john 3: 16 and many other places) which means you have to repent (if you do not repent you can not have true saving faith)
Adding any work, no matter what it is (water baptism, churhc membership. Taking communion, Giving to the poor. Obeying Gods commands) are adding ones work to the equation of grace through faith. And is a false gospel. Period.
Baptism (HS) is a result of the gospel being applied to our lives
Baptism (water) is an act of obedience to the God who SAVED (yes past tense) us and the ability to give a testimony of God to whoever is witnessing your baptism)
Again, Paul said it best, Not by works of righteousness which we have done (water baptism IS a work of righteousness) But by his mercy, He saved us by the washing (water) and renewal (new birth) OF The HOLY SPIRIT (the one who does the washing and gives us new life)
If I have to do the work of water baptism to be saved, Salvation is NOT by grace, but by works. And if your going to obey one command, You better follow them all. Because if it is of works. We better be perfect.
the penalty of sin is death, It is not being water baptised. The payment can only be paid by death (the cross) Water baptism has NO PART in salvation. Period.
There is something ironic here. You must not add anything to faith, except here
is someone adding a negative to faith. You must not do this or believe that or
have this approach.
This is denying the very things it is trying to assert, putting conditions on faith,
while denying one should do this. Faith is faith, without dependency, and applies
irrespective of behavior or even later belief or position. It is like the temporary
lock and load idea, except God decides who locks and loads, because none of this is
us. So if nothing is of us, why even the idea any human can stop Gods working
or even any belief system could oppose Him? It is because though they feel great
antagonism against some, and feel value in applying terms like false teacher etc.
their own belief system denies this has any value.
So any argument is used from either end, not because it is consistent in their
belief system, but as a way of undermining biblical understanding of God.
Once one says God does not care about purity and holiness in believers, you can
live how you want, because you are in the driving seat. They will claim God does
care, which is why He looks at Jesus, but this is just nonsense and a distraction.
Believers are not Holy or cleansed or walking in obedience. It is this why it is a faith
of the world put in christian clothing.
I have faith in Christ and a desire to walk as He walks, and in their theology I am saved.
If they say I am not saved, they already deny their own belief system which is how
absurd they are. It is only their personal conviction and emotional dedication to sound
sensible while speaking this double speak as if it makes any sense or means anything
other than excusing their own sinful behavior.
Let me illustrate double speak. Do not be impure and live a Holy life means, Christ is
our purity by faith, and He is our holiness by faith, so we do not have to be any of
these things, just believe. Except this is not what Paul is saying or the apostles, but
once you can become someone else, you can put all the good stuff as statement of
Christ our shield. This is a form of universalism, God does everything and we have to
do nothing and take no responsibility or change in our lives.
In a nice world, they can live with themselves. If persecution comes and life becomes
hard, they will just fall apart, because they have never entered in and been cleansed in
their hearts. It is this brutal and this false. It is the fruit of wealth and an easy life,
where true testing has passed them by.