Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
U

UnderGrace

Guest
You see Ralphie, the points are actually 40 - love (0) .... game over ....and you have yet to make your point

But I do admire how you keep swinging the tennis racket :):rolleyes:

I KNEW someone would say this. This is too funny.
That was hardly an attack, but of course you all are looking diligently for an occasion to catch me in something instead of actually discussing the topic and proving your points.
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
No name's mentors=God and Jesus,shame on them I suppose right Ralphie boy!?
Did you have something useful to add to the discussion/argument/debate? Do you even know what Calvinism is? Did you know that's where once saved always saved comes from? Did you also know it is being abandoned for a new once saved always saved doctrine? One I am willing to bet lunch you subscribe to. Let's find out. Shall we?
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
You see Ralphie, the points are actually 40 - love (0) .... game over ....and you have yet to make your point

But I do admire how you keep swinging the tennis racket :):rolleyes:
It's best to have strings in it...:cool:
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
You see Ralphie, the points are actually 40 - love (0) .... game over ....and you have yet to make your point

But I do admire how you keep swinging the tennis racket :)
So you're stepping out of the ring? I had the feeling my post addressing your post from the other night was going to cause you to do that. That's fine. It's your choice. I can't make you go toe to toe with me.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
So you don't want to get banned but it is okay to entice someone else to discuss the new OSAS so that they might get banned?

Did you have something useful to add to the discussion/argument/debate? Do you even know what Calvinism is? Did you know that's where once saved always saved comes from? Did you also know it is being abandoned for a new once saved always saved doctrine? One I am willing to bet lunch you subscribe to. Let's find out. Shall we?
 
J

joefizz

Guest
Did you have something useful to add to the discussion/argument/debate? Do you even know what Calvinism is? Did you know that's where once saved always saved comes from? Did you also know it is being abandoned for a new once saved always saved doctrine? One I am willing to bet lunch you subscribe to. Let's find out. Shall we?
Sure you can make a new thread if it means that much to you.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
There's a new OSAS?

Did it undergo some kind of osmosis?
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
Wrongo there are no "debates or arguments here" just "discussions and fellowship".
Arguments and debates are not bad things......unless you start making personal attacks instead of actually talking about the topic.

Well, got anything useful to add toward some productive conversation here?
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Just having fun Ralphie :) You are good with the comebacks

We will see what tomorrow brings ...

So you're stepping out of the ring? I had the feeling my post addressing your post from the other night was going to cause you to do that. That's fine. It's your choice. I can't make you go toe to toe with me.
 
J

joefizz

Guest
So you're stepping out of the ring? I had the feeling my post addressing your post from the other night was going to cause you to do that. That's fine. It's your choice. I can't make you go toe to toe with me.
Ring???
why do you want a duel?
God gets all the glory not us.
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
There's a new OSAS?

Did it undergo some kind of osmosis?
See? I told you. It sneeked in unawares. You don't even know, do you? I've been saying this all along. Wake up, people.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I would agree on this, but the debate needs to be based on presenting the facts not misrepresenting the facts


Arguments and debates are not bad things......unless you start making personal attacks instead of actually talking about the topic.

Well, got anything useful to add toward some productive conversation here?
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
I would agree on this, but the debate needs to be based on presenting the facts not misrepresenting the facts
Don't yak. Just take my last post that I directed to your comments and discuss it with me. If you think I need to have the facts straightened out for me, do it. Let's talk. That's why I posted it.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
I'll stick with me old OSAS not some new fangled MOSAS OSAS
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
Ring???
why do you want a duel?
God gets all the glory not us.
I'm contending for the faith as Jude says to. Aren't you? You do know it's okay to do that, right? Paul said he fights not as one swinging in the air. I don't either.
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
I would agree on this, but the debate needs to be based on presenting the facts not misrepresenting the facts
The thing is UG, that one point of view can easily be "overruled" by another point of view - the whole context needs to be discussed and that can rarely be done in a few lines of a post. A wall of text tends not to be read.

So what we end up with is wrangling back and forth getting no where - each party holding to its own "position".
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
Umm nope it was your turn to respond to my comment and I also provided the link which is about 20 posts back now

#51306

And you also said you were afraid to talk about free grace because you did not want to get banned.

Make up your mind Ralphie..:confused:

Don't yak. Just take my last post that I directed to your comments and discuss it with me. If you think I need to have the facts straightened out for me, do it. Let's talk. That's why I posted it.
 
J

joefizz

Guest
I'm contending for the faith as Jude says to. Aren't you? You do know it's okay to do that, right? Paul said he fights not as one swinging in the air. I don't either.
I already have the faith why contend for it?
 
R

Ralph-

Guest
I'll stick with me old OSAS not some new fangled MOSAS OSAS
I have the feeling you don't even know what the new once saved always saved is. If you did you'd be liking my posts and supporting me, not ridiculing me.

I've been trying to make an appeal to the old school once saved always saved people here to join in resisting this new onslaught of doctrine, but it seems they don't even know what they should be fighting against.

The bottom line is, I suspect our old school once saved always saved people aren't as old school as they think they are and have been seduced by the new once saved always saved and don't even realize it. That's what I'm pointing out.