And those alive at the rapture will be very, very few.
Where are the rest?
And those alive at the rapture will be very, very few.
The passage about two being in a field and one is taken the other not, with the follow up that the birds feast on the bodies of those taken, suggests this is about the taking of the wicked. Since one is left, it would indicate that not all die and this would be one we rule over when we return.I still wonder, who is there to reign over?
1 Corinthians 15:23 "But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming."
This is about the resurrection, so now let us assume Revelation 20 is literal two resurrections 1000 years apart. (ahem john 5:28-29, john 6:40)
1 Corinthians 15:23 would be the first resurrection, at the Second Coming when Jesus returns.
But in 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9 "In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;"
We have here those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord (the unsaved) destroyed at the Second Coming.
So do you see my point that there is no fleshly people in the earthly millennium to reign over. All the saints have glorified bodies in which no one can die not even at 100 years old (Isaiah 65:20) and all the wicked will be destroyed.
So my question is: Who is left to reign over?
Taken where? Like in Noah's day, flood, people perished.
- Thomas IceThe Greek word used in Matthew 24:40-41 is paralambano, made up of the root word lambano, which means “to take” or “receive” and the preposition para, which means “along side of.” Thus, the meaning of this verb is “to take into close association, take (to oneself), take with/along.”
One is taken to be at Christ's side.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
The days of Noah describe a general state of unrighteousness out side the Church (the ark).
But the destruction element is limited to Jerusalem.
Luke 17 37 And they answered and said unto him, Where, Lord? And he said unto them, Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together.
Matthew 24 26“So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 28Wherever there is a carcass, there the vultures will gather.
Luke 17 26“Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. 27People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all.
28“It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. 29But the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all. 30“It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed. 31On that day no one who is on the housetop, with possessions inside, should go down to get them. Likewise, no one in the field should go back for anything. 32Remember Lot’s wife! 33Whoever tries to keep their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life will preserve it. 34I tell you, on that night two people will be in one bed; one will be taken and the other left. 35Two women will be grinding grain together; one will be taken and the other left.” [36][SUP]e[/SUP] 37“Where, Lord?” they asked. He replied, “Where there is a dead body, there the vultures will gather.”
The vultures gather. This is the fate of the wicked. God takes those who are His, then the wicked are taken, and for every one of them, there is one left behind. There will be some unsaved people who survive both tribulation and wrath.
@Issachar
No. As it says, 'after the tribulation of those days' so it is post AD70.
Living waters flowed out of Jerusalem when Jesus came the first time.
John 7:38 KJV
He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.
There you go, yanking a verse out of Context again, and trying to MAKE IT SAY what YOU WANT to mean. When you READ it in CONTEXT, this CLEARLY IS TALKING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS IMMEDIATELY AFTER CHRIST'S SECOND COMING TO RECLAIM THE EARTH.
There you go, yanking a verse out of Context again, and trying to MAKE IT SAY what YOU WANT to mean. When you READ it in CONTEXT, this CLEARLY IS TALKING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS IMMEDIATELY AFTER CHRIST'S SECOND COMING TO RECLAIM THE EARTH.
VCO is suffering from what I call dispie blindness. This is the inability to see anything outside the lens of the second coming... it is a curable disease though.well I have read it carefully in context and it clearly refers to Pentecost and what follows![]()
Taken where? Like in Noah's day, flood, people perished.
I think I'm starting to see the disconnect between dispensationalist and non-dispensationalist.
Dispensationalist believe that the milennial kingdom is going be like a magical kingdom where plants and animals will speak audibly, and mountains will drop literal new wine and the hills will flow with literal milk and literal rivers will flow with literal "living" water that sustains life. So when the bible talks about any of these things and history doesn't back up those facts, that means it happens in the milinneum.
Non-dispensationalist believe that all those things are symbolic of spiritual things that have been mostly fulfilled by Christ at the first coming because the bible says "this was done to fulfill...".
Dispies take everything literal and non-dispies take everything non-literal... the truth is probably some where between those 2 views.
One thing we know for sure is that the new testament age is approximately 2000 years long, that's found in several places in the bible (hidden of course and most people wont believe it).Well dispies claim they take things literally but really they are adding 2000 year gaps and church ages all over the place.
Pot meet kettle. Has anyone considered that much of the things that are interpreted as referring to the millennial kingdom even though it is no where mentioned in those passages, could actually be talking about the New Heaven and New Earth? Not speaking about animal sacrifices or death here, but things like peace and wolf not eating the lamb.