Legalism is stating that something which is said to be a gift must be earned by some work. it is saying salvation is earned or maintained by some legal set of rules or guidelines,
however, i agree, legalism is no better than lawlessness (or as some put it, licentiousness) . I feel both are based on pride of the person who holds to either gospel.
Now if someone hold that they are maintained by faith working through their lives to
bring about righteousness, they are neither legalists or lawless. Faith, or the real
relationship with God, open, emotional, empathetic, loving, shunning evil and delighting
in good, that is where Gods heart is.
Occasionally g7 displays this view and others, but there is a continual desire to stamp
out anything related to legalism or anything talking about rules or precepts.
This makes me wonder. Love, and how we love is based on ideas. You cannot love in
isolation. I could love evil, and that would not be good. I could love to exalt myself,
or I could love to serve, and honour God. As soon as you decide one avenue is not right
while the other is pleasing to the Lord you have created a rule or structure.
So some of this language is not clearly defined. Precepts and rules are part of life, the
govern everything we do. To get from one place to another I have to apply rules, energy,
precepts, take care etc. or nothing happens.
So all anarchistic philosphies or anti-rules based position are actually about a rejection of
a group or experience common to the people and opening up to a different set of groups or
experiences. I have noticed this when Kenneth Copeland opened up to the Pope. It is clearly
about power and allegiance rather than belief or ideas.
Another analogy here on cc, is personalising attacks to individuals rather than the theology or
ideas. This again shows the ideas mean less than identifying with the group.
But God is impartial, and has always been about precepts, rules, boundaries, clean and unclean,
righteous and sinful. Cain and Able, one offered a pleasing sacrifice the other not.