I don't disagree with vetting people throughly at all, but one person cannot say I don't want
you in my adopted country, when they have already been granted legal access rights and have
done nothing wrong.
I'd agree with this.
One person can't just stomp their feet and make all the laws by themselves - they became a
law unto themselves and that is far too much power for one person to have. Instead of a democracy
you end up with a dictatorship. I hope for the sake of the American people that the US doesn't become a
dictatorship. I doubt it will but Trump seems to relish the idea of that.
Think Barrack Obama.
I don't disagree completely with some of his sentiments and I wish the UK was better at vetting people
and we adopted something along the lines of the Australian model, but the way Trump is
charging in with little thought or consideration of the impact, is suggestive of a person with
narcissistic tendencies.
How is isolating wannabe immigrants on an island more humane than preventing them to come over in the first place ? If Trump had given notice (say a month or so) of his intent, would it be unrealistic to think that many undesirables would have tried to "beat his deadline" for entry ? I think they would have. No matter how this issue was approached, fault would be found somewhere. Trump's sending a message ... a strong one. Those already properly screened won't have an issue ... except for a few month delay before returning to status quo for them. The undesirables and ill-intentioned already in the U.S. now know that new recruits won't be joining them anytime soon. It's a tough stance. But so are the consequences of not doing anything.