That's a VERY controversial subject here.
One time I voted on issues. The issue was cutting funding for schools that didn't produce certain test scores. I marked that no, I don't believe set scores should be a mandate for funding. Not because of teacher jobs, and not because I think all teachers are alike... but because the child in the teacher's classroom is a product of six or so years of conditioning out of their control, that greatly affects how that child learns and how they receive information. I think some teachers could certainly be better, but I don't think they should be penalize or even rewarded on how well a child learns, because there are so many other external and internal factors the teacher doesn't control. So that's my take on that, and actually, I'm on the fence about rewards or higher wages for some teachers than others. Yes, it provides them an incentive, but they didn't mold that child - their parents and their previous environment did, so I don't think REWARDS or PENALTIES is objectively fair.
One time I voted on issues. The issue was cutting funding for schools that didn't produce certain test scores. I marked that no, I don't believe set scores should be a mandate for funding. Not because of teacher jobs, and not because I think all teachers are alike... but because the child in the teacher's classroom is a product of six or so years of conditioning out of their control, that greatly affects how that child learns and how they receive information. I think some teachers could certainly be better, but I don't think they should be penalize or even rewarded on how well a child learns, because there are so many other external and internal factors the teacher doesn't control. So that's my take on that, and actually, I'm on the fence about rewards or higher wages for some teachers than others. Yes, it provides them an incentive, but they didn't mold that child - their parents and their previous environment did, so I don't think REWARDS or PENALTIES is objectively fair.
So, the solution is to treat them as equal at the time they earn their salary, right, sister?
For example, teachers may have some other work responsibilities (class director, class director coordinator, department coordinator, etc). All these positions are very intensive, adding much more responsibilities and (in most cases) more working hours. However, you can be or can not be. That will have to due with your working schedule. So, two teachers with the same working time (15 years, for example) have the following situation: Teacher A only gives his classes; Teacher B has to give his classes and have one of those positions. Still, they both earn the same.
I must ask: is that fair?
Last edited: