my experience with putting mainstream science and the genesis stories together is that one ends up with something not really scientific and also not a quality reading of the stories.
imo
Experiences of various people can be different.
my experience with putting mainstream science and the genesis stories together is that one ends up with something not really scientific and also not a quality reading of the stories.
imo
What I am saying is that you have to accept by faith what Mr. Hansen presents. I think God is more reliable than Mr. Hansen."Refuting error with more error is hardly logical." - where do you see an error in what Kirk Hansen proved? But I am glad you accept your argument was an error.
"Young earth is simple." - Young or old, I dont know why young would be more simple or why does it matter.
"God said it..." No, God did not say that Earth is young. In fact, Bible says Earth is old:
Hear O mountains…you everlasting foundations of the earth (Micah 6:2).
The ancient mountains crumbled, and the age-old hills collapsed (Habakkuk 3:6).
If you meant that to believe in a young earth is more simple for you, I cannot agree even in this. Because if you believe in a young earth, you must live in a huge tension with the outside world, similar to if you believe in a flat Earth or geocentrism.
one thing that a lot of people disagree with me on, but makes a lot of sense to me, is that
God created the universe "already in motion", such that we may rightly observe the universe to be old, but it is actually much younger.
Gods power has always been and always will be eternal. The earth has a beginning and an end.That contradicts the Bible. Bible says that what can be seen in nature is precise:
"For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." Romans 1:20
Notice the term "his eternal power have been clearly seen". Eternal is a very long time.
What I am saying is that you have to accept by faith what Mr. Hansen presents. I think God is more reliable than Mr. Hansen.
I live at peace with God. The bible never claimed the earth was flat.
So ancient is not 6000 or 7000 years? If the mountains were as old as you want to make them they would have eroded by water and wind down to nothing.
I'm not sorry that your bubble has been deflated.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Gods power has always been and always will be eternal. The earth has a beginning and an end.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
Exactly. How do you test Mr. Hansen's theories? Can you replicate his ideas in the lab? Is what he says repeatable and measurable?Accept by faith what was proved? You dont understand the point of science and what exactly is a proof. Science, that needs faith to be accepted, is a wrong science.
Astronomy works, medicine based on human genom works, physics works... so these theories are working. If it would not work, we would have to find another one, that is working.
Listen to yourself. Now let's nuance the language to fit the conclusion."Eternal" in Greek does not always mean what "eternal" in English. But you want only simple things, so I will not go into this topic.
Experiences of various people can be different.
That contradicts the Bible. Bible says that what can be seen in nature is precise:
"For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." Romans 1:20
Notice the term "his eternal power have been clearly seen". Eternal is a very long time.
I believe science, when it comes to the age of the earth..............is catching up with the bible.
At satans fall, God took away light(angels apparently need light to function)and froze the earth and the heavens(second heaven/our universe). Everything STOPPED. who knows if it was 10 years or a million years or a billion years before God said ," let there be light." And restored the earth and created mankind to be a witness for Gods kingdom and satans "appeal trial".
I love how YEC use the Flood as this magical answer for everything that points to the earth being much older than it is.
The Flood covers the holes of YEC just like it covered the earth![]()
My bad folk. Posted this in the wrong thread.Came across an article this morning that was interesting. Could not link (computer illiterate here), but google 'caveman's best friends? Ice Age puppies awe scientists'.
Well you do not create credibility when you say you were Christian and no longer are Christian. You have improperly understood what being a Christian encompasses.I'm not here to cause trouble. I just come from a different point of view. It doesn't make the words I say immediately worthless. Yes, the post about the Flood was more lighthearted, but other things I post on this forum are genuine inquiries, questions, or insights that I have being once a Christian myself, and frankly, I'm tired of hearing Christians on here dismiss what I have to say solely because I am no longer a Christian.
I love how YEC use the Flood as this magical answer for everything that points to the earth being much older than it is.
The Flood covers the holes of YEC just like it covered the earth![]()
I'm not here to cause trouble. I just come from a different point of view. It doesn't make the words I say immediately worthless. Yes, the post about the Flood was more lighthearted, but other things I post on this forum are genuine inquiries, questions, or insights that I have being once a Christian myself, and frankly, I'm tired of hearing Christians on here dismiss what I have to say solely because I am no longer a Christian.
if you would like to post a timeline or version that fits well with mainstream science and also uses the tone and inferences in the story, I would like to read it.