No "dude" I am not going to get "over it." Its not the"king jimmy." It is the Kind James Bible. So get it right. And yes the modern versions are inferior. That is a fact.
And the King James Holy Bible is inerrant just as the originals were. And so it Does not have any mistakes.
1 John 5:7 does have some Greek textual support. In fact, there are about 5 remaining Greek manuscripts which contain the first epistle of John in whole or in part that date back to the 7th century and even before. There is plenty of evidence for 1 John 5:7. It is found in all reformation Bibles ( Tyndale, Coverdale, Bishop's, Great, Geneva, etc). Also 1 John 5:7 was quoted by Cyprian (215 AD) and it was cited by Athanasius (350 AD) in his writing against the Arians.
Plus, Stephanus had 1 John 5:7 in 9 of his Greek copies. So your argument against the validity of 1 John 5:7 is an illegitimate one.
Acts 19:2 is
NOT a translational error. It is perfectly fine as rendered in the Authorized Version.
And I have done my home work. I suggest you do yours. The modern versions are Vatican versions. Will Kinney already proved that they are in the following video teaching:
Proof: Modern Translations are Catholic by Will Kinney
[video=youtube;UCx5NSY0Oe4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCx5NSY0Oe4&feature=youtube_gdata_player[/video]